Nuprl Lemma : unit-fps_wf

*1* ∈ FinProbSpace


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  unit-fps: *1*,  finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace,  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  unit-fps: *1*,  finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace,  and: P ∧ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  qeq: qeq(r;s),  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  evalall: evalall(t),  qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j],  rng_sum: rng_sum,  mon_itop: Π lb ≤ i < ub. E[i],  itop: Π(op,id) lb ≤ i < ub. E[i],  ycomb: Y,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  lt_int: i <z j,  length: ||as||,  list_ind: list_ind,  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  infix_ap: x f y,  grp_op: *,  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  add_grp_of_rng: r↓+gp,  rng_plus: +r,  qrng: <ℚ+*>,  qadd: r + s,  subtract: n - m,  bfalse: ff,  grp_id: e,  rng_zero: 0,  select: L[n],  eq_int: (i =z j),  assert: ↑b,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :  l_member_wf,  l_all_wf2,  equal-wf-T-base,  rationals_wf,  l_all_nil,  false_wf,  qle-int,  qle_wf,  l_all_cons,  int_seg_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  intformless_wf,  decidable__lt,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  int_seg_properties,  length_of_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  nil_wf,  cons_wf,  select_wf,  length_wf,  qsum_wf,  assert-qeq
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  cut,  lemma_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  intEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  addEquality,  productElimination,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  applyEquality,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  productEquality,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  setEquality

Latex:
*1*  \mmember{}  FinProbSpace



Date html generated: 2016_05_15-PM-11_44_45
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_17-AM-10_07_40

Theory : randomness


Home Index