Nuprl Lemma : values-for-distinct-property

∀[A,V:Type].
  ∀eq:EqDecider(A). ∀L:(A × V) List.
    ((||values-for-distinct(eq;L)|| = ||remove-repeats(eq;map(λp.(fst(p));L))|| ∈ ℤ)
    ∧ (∀i:ℕ||remove-repeats(eq;map(λp.(fst(p));L))||
         (<remove-repeats(eq;map(λp.(fst(p));L))[i], values-for-distinct(eq;L)[i]> ∈ L)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  values-for-distinct: values-for-distinct(eq;L),  remove-repeats: remove-repeats(eq;L),  l_member: (x ∈ l),  select: L[n],  length: ||as||,  map: map(f;as),  list: T List,  deq: EqDecider(T),  int_seg: {i..j-},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  pi1: fst(t),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  lambda: λx.A[x],  pair: <a, b>,  product: x:A × B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  member: t ∈ T,  cand: A c∧ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  values-for-distinct: values-for-distinct(eq;L),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  le: A ≤ B,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  uimplies: b supposing a,  int_seg: {i..j-},  pi1: fst(t),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  outl: outl(x),  isl: isl(x)
Lemmas referenced :  deq_wf,  list_wf,  pi1_wf,  map_wf,  remove-repeats_wf,  length_wf,  int_seg_wf,  istype-void,  length-map,  select_member,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  intformless_wf,  decidable__lt,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-int,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__le,  int_seg_properties,  select_wf,  member-remove-repeats,  isl-apply-alist,  l_member_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  select-map,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf,  apply-alist_wf,  assert_elim,  btrue_wf,  bfalse_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse
Rules used in proof :  because_Cache,  inhabitedIsType,  productIsType,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality_alt,  productEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  universeIsType,  hypothesis,  independent_pairFormation,  cut,  lambdaFormation_alt,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  dependent_functionElimination,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  independent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  unionElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  independent_isectElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  productElimination,  hyp_replacement,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  equalityIstype,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A,V:Type].
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(A).  \mforall{}L:(A  \mtimes{}  V)  List.
        ((||values-for-distinct(eq;L)||  =  ||remove-repeats(eq;map(\mlambda{}p.(fst(p));L))||)
        \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}||remove-repeats(eq;map(\mlambda{}p.(fst(p));L))||
                  (<remove-repeats(eq;map(\mlambda{}p.(fst(p));L))[i],  values-for-distinct(eq;L)[i]>  \mmember{}  L)))



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-10_24_16
Last ObjectModification: 2019_08_05-PM-02_03_49

Theory : decidable!equality


Home Index