Nuprl Lemma : make-proof-tree_wf

∀[Sequent,Rule:Type]. ∀[effect:(Sequent × Rule) ⟶ (Sequent List?)]. ∀[s:Sequent]. ∀[r:Rule].
∀[L:proof-tree(Sequent;Rule;effect) List].
  (make-proof-tree(s;r;L) ∈ proof-tree(Sequent;Rule;effect)) supposing 
     ((||L|| = ||outl(effect <s, r>)|| ∈ ℤ) and 
     (↑isl(effect <s, r>)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  make-proof-tree: make-proof-tree(s;r;L),  proof-tree: proof-tree(Sequent;Rule;effect),  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  outl: outl(x),  assert: ↑b,  isl: isl(x),  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  unit: Unit,  member: t ∈ T,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  pair: <a, b>,  product: x:A × B[x],  union: left + right,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  outl: outl(x),  isl: isl(x),  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  make-proof-tree: make-proof-tree(s;r;L),  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  int_seg: {i..j-},  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  bfalse: ff,  ext-eq: A ≡ B
Lemmas referenced :  equal_wf,  length_wf,  proof-tree_wf,  list_wf,  unit_wf2,  assert_elim,  isl_wf,  bfalse_wf,  and_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  assert_wf,  int_seg_wf,  select_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  true_wf,  false_wf,  proof-tree-ext
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  intEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  unionEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  because_Cache,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  universeEquality,  dependent_pairEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  voidEquality,  lambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  functionExtensionality,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[Sequent,Rule:Type].  \mforall{}[effect:(Sequent  \mtimes{}  Rule)  {}\mrightarrow{}  (Sequent  List?)].  \mforall{}[s:Sequent].  \mforall{}[r:Rule].
\mforall{}[L:proof-tree(Sequent;Rule;effect)  List].
    (make-proof-tree(s;r;L)  \mmember{}  proof-tree(Sequent;Rule;effect))  supposing 
          ((||L||  =  ||outl(effect  <s,  r>)||)  and 
          (\muparrow{}isl(effect  <s,  r>)))



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_06_14
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_21-PM-01_58_00

Theory : general


Home Index