Nuprl Lemma : rsum-split-first-shift

[n,m:ℤ]. ∀[x:{n..m 1-} ⟶ ℝ].  Σ{x[i] n≤i≤m} (x[n] + Σ{x[i 1] n≤i≤1}) supposing n ≤ m


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rsum: Σ{x[k] n≤k≤m} req: y radd: b real: int_seg: {i..j-} uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] le: A ≤ B function: x:A ⟶ B[x] subtract: m add: m natural_number: $n int:
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a so_apply: x[s] int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k and: P ∧ Q all: x:A. B[x] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q not: ¬A implies:  Q satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False top: Top prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] uiff: uiff(P;Q) rev_implies:  Q iff: ⇐⇒ Q
Lemmas referenced :  rsum-split-first int_seg_wf real_wf req_witness radd_wf decidable__le full-omega-unsat intformnot_wf intformle_wf itermVar_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_wf decidable__lt intformand_wf intformless_wf itermAdd_wf itermConstant_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_term_value_add_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma lelt_wf rsum_wf subtract_wf add-member-int_seg2 subtract-add-cancel itermSubtract_wf int_term_value_subtract_lemma add-subtract-cancel le_wf req_wf iff_weakening_uiff req_functionality req_weakening radd_functionality rsum-shift
Rules used in proof :  cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation hypothesis sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality functionEquality addEquality natural_numberEquality intEquality independent_isectElimination applyEquality functionExtensionality dependent_set_memberEquality because_Cache independent_pairFormation dependent_functionElimination unionElimination approximateComputation independent_functionElimination dependent_pairFormation lambdaEquality int_eqEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality sqequalRule setElimination rename productElimination cumulativity isectEquality addLevel

Latex:
\mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[x:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}].    \mSigma{}\{x[i]  |  n\mleq{}i\mleq{}m\}  =  (x[n]  +  \mSigma{}\{x[i  +  1]  |  n\mleq{}i\mleq{}m  -  1\})  supposing  n  \mleq{}  m



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-PM-01_51_47
Last ObjectModification: 2017_10_25-PM-03_41_35

Theory : reals


Home Index