Nuprl Lemma : qabs-of-non-positive

[q:ℚ]. |q| -(q) supposing q ≤ 0


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qabs: |r| qle: r ≤ s qmul: s rationals: uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] minus: -n natural_number: $n sqequal: t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a qabs: |r| callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall has-value: (a)↓ has-valueall: has-valueall(a) prop: subtype_rel: A ⊆B all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q bool: 𝔹 unit: Unit it: btrue: tt uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q ifthenelse: if then else fi  bfalse: ff iff: ⇐⇒ Q not: ¬A rev_implies:  Q guard: {T} false: False
Lemmas referenced :  valueall-type-has-valueall rationals_wf rationals-valueall-type evalall-reduce qle_wf int-subtype-rationals qpositive_wf bool_wf equal-wf-T-base assert_wf qless_wf bnot_wf not_wf uiff_transitivity eqtt_to_assert assert-qpositive iff_transitivity iff_weakening_uiff eqff_to_assert assert_of_bnot equal_wf qless_transitivity_2_qorder qless_irreflexivity
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut sqequalRule extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesis independent_isectElimination hypothesisEquality callbyvalueReduce sqequalAxiom natural_numberEquality applyEquality isect_memberEquality because_Cache equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry baseClosed lambdaFormation unionElimination equalityElimination independent_functionElimination productElimination independent_pairFormation impliesFunctionality dependent_functionElimination voidElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[q:\mBbbQ{}].  |q|  \msim{}  -(q)  supposing  q  \mleq{}  0



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-11_52_55
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_45_17

Theory : rationals


Home Index