Nuprl Lemma : implies-qle2

∀[a,b:ℚ].  a ≤ b supposing ∀e:ℚ. (0 < e ⇒ (a ≤ (b + e)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qle: r ≤ s,  qless: r < s,  qadd: r + s,  rationals: ℚ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q
Lemmas referenced :  qadd_wf,  qle_wf,  qless_wf,  all_wf,  qle_witness,  nat_plus_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  intformnot_wf,  decidable__lt,  qless-int,  qinv-positive,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  int-equal-in-rationals,  equal_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  nat_plus_properties,  int-subtype-rationals,  less_than_wf,  rationals_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  qdiv_wf,  implies-qle
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lemma_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  addLevel,  impliesFunctionality,  productElimination,  baseClosed,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  functionEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry

Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b:\mBbbQ{}].    a  \mleq{}  b  supposing  \mforall{}e:\mBbbQ{}.  (0  <  e  {}\mRightarrow{}  (a  \mleq{}  (b  +  e)))



Date html generated: 2016_05_15-PM-11_32_46
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_16-PM-09_13_55

Theory : rationals


Home Index