Nuprl Lemma : comparison-seq_wf

∀[T:Type]. ∀[c1:comparison(T)]. ∀[c2:⋂a:T. comparison({b:T| (c1 a b) = 0 ∈ ℤ} )].  (comparison-seq(c1; c2) ∈ comparison(\000CT))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  comparison-seq: comparison-seq(c1; c2),  comparison: comparison(T),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  apply: f a,  isect: ⋂x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  comparison: comparison(T),  comparison-seq: comparison-seq(c1; c2),  and: P ∧ Q,  has-value: (a)↓,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  cand: A c∧ B,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  le: A ≤ B
Lemmas referenced :  value-type-has-value,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  int_subtype_base,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  istype-int,  istype-le,  comparison_wf,  equal-wf-base,  istype-universe,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermMinus_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int-value-type,  comparison-reflexive,  minus-is-int-iff,  false_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  sq_stable__le,  nequal-le-implies,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  decidable__le,  le_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  productElimination,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  sqequalRule,  callbyvalueReduce,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  hypothesis,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  Error :equalityIstype,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  voidElimination,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :universeIsType,  Error :productIsType,  Error :functionIsType,  minusEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  axiomEquality,  Error :isectIsType,  setEquality,  intEquality,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  Error :isectIsTypeImplies,  universeEquality,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  cumulativity,  pointwiseFunctionality,  closedConclusion,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[c1:comparison(T)].  \mforall{}[c2:\mcap{}a:T.  comparison(\{b:T|  (c1  a  b)  =  0\}  )].
    (comparison-seq(c1;  c2)  \mmember{}  comparison(T))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-01_42_24
Last ObjectModification: 2019_05_03-PM-02_10_37

Theory : list_1


Home Index