Nuprl Lemma : bag-count-drop-trivial

∀[T:Type]. ∀eq:EqDecider(T). ∀[x,y:T]. ∀[bs:bag(T)].  (#y in bag-drop(eq;bs;x)) = (#y in bs) ∈ ℕ supposing ¬(x = y ∈ T)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-drop: bag-drop(eq;bs;a),  bag-count: (#x in bs),  bag: bag(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  bag-drop: bag-drop(eq;bs;a),  or: P ∨ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  label: ...$L... t,  decidable: Dec(P),  false: False,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  nat: ℕ,  guard: {T},  ge: i ≥ j ,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bag-count: (#x in bs),  count: count(P;L),  reduce: reduce(f;k;as),  list_ind: list_ind,  single-bag: {x},  cons: [a / b],  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  deq: EqDecider(T),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  btrue: tt,  eqof: eqof(d),  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  bag-remove1-property,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  nat_wf,  bag-count_wf,  bag-count-append,  single-bag_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  add-is-int-iff,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  false_wf,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  le_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  not_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  safe-assert-deq,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  decide_bfalse_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  unionElimination,  productElimination,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  cumulativity,  pointwiseFunctionality,  rename,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  instantiate,  addEquality,  hyp_replacement,  axiomEquality,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(T)
        \mforall{}[x,y:T].  \mforall{}[bs:bag(T)].    (\#y  in  bag-drop(eq;bs;x))  =  (\#y  in  bs)  supposing  \mneg{}(x  =  y)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_48_38
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_30_43

Theory : bags_2


Home Index