Nuprl Lemma : callbyvalueall_seq-eta
∀[F,G,K:Top]. ∀[J:ℤ ⟶ ℤ]. ∀[n,m:ℕ].
  callbyvalueall_seq(λi.(K J[i]);G;F;n;m) ~ callbyvalueall_seq(K;G;F;n;m) supposing ∀i:{n..m + 1-}. (J[i] = i ∈ ℤ)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
callbyvalueall_seq: callbyvalueall_seq(L;G;F;n;m)
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
top: Top
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
apply: f a
, 
lambda: λx.A[x]
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
, 
add: n + m
, 
natural_number: $n
, 
int: ℤ
, 
sqequal: s ~ t
, 
equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
false: False
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
not: ¬A
, 
top: Top
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
guard: {T}
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
callbyvalueall_seq: callbyvalueall_seq(L;G;F;n;m)
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
btrue: tt
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
bnot: ¬bb
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced : 
decidable__le, 
subtract_wf, 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_subtract_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
le_wf, 
decidable__equal_int, 
intformeq_wf, 
itermAdd_wf, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
int_term_value_add_lemma, 
equal_wf, 
subtype_base_sq, 
int_subtype_base, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
ge_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
all_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
nat_wf, 
le_int_wf, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_le_int, 
eqff_to_assert, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
decidable__lt, 
lelt_wf, 
iff_weakening_equal, 
top_wf
Rules used in proof : 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
because_Cache, 
hypothesis, 
unionElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
isectElimination, 
hypothesisEquality, 
natural_numberEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
lambdaEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
sqequalRule, 
independent_pairFormation, 
computeAll, 
addEquality, 
productElimination, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
independent_functionElimination, 
intWeakElimination, 
lambdaFormation, 
sqequalAxiom, 
applyEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
equalityElimination, 
promote_hyp, 
imageElimination, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed, 
functionEquality, 
isect_memberFormation
Latex:
\mforall{}[F,G,K:Top].  \mforall{}[J:\mBbbZ{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbN{}].
    callbyvalueall\_seq(\mlambda{}i.(K  J[i]);G;F;n;m)  \msim{}  callbyvalueall\_seq(K;G;F;n;m) 
    supposing  \mforall{}i:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}.  (J[i]  =  i)
Date html generated:
2017_10_01-AM-08_42_18
Last ObjectModification:
2017_07_26-PM-04_29_07
Theory : untyped!computation
Home
Index