Nuprl Lemma : callbyvalueall_seq-eta

∀[F,G,K:Top]. ∀[J:ℤ ⟶ ℤ]. ∀[n,m:ℕ].
  callbyvalueall_seq(λi.(K J[i]);G;F;n;m) ~ callbyvalueall_seq(K;G;F;n;m) supposing ∀i:{n..m + 1-}. (J[i] = i ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  callbyvalueall_seq: callbyvalueall_seq(L;G;F;n;m),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  sqequal: s ~ t,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  int_seg: {i..j-},  callbyvalueall_seq: callbyvalueall_seq(L;G;F;n;m),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  equal_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  nat_wf,  le_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  top_wf
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  addEquality,  productElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  functionEquality,  isect_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[F,G,K:Top].  \mforall{}[J:\mBbbZ{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbN{}].
    callbyvalueall\_seq(\mlambda{}i.(K  J[i]);G;F;n;m)  \msim{}  callbyvalueall\_seq(K;G;F;n;m) 
    supposing  \mforall{}i:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}.  (J[i]  =  i)



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_42_18
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_29_07

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index