Nuprl Lemma : b-almost-full-intersection-lemma

∀R,T:ℕ ⟶ ℕ ⟶ ℙ.
  (b-almost-full(n,m.R[n;m])
  ⇒ b-almost-full(n,m.T[n;m])
  ⇒ (∀s:StrictInc. ⇃(∃m:ℕ. ∃n,p:{m + 1...}. (R[s m;s n] ∧ T[s m;s p]))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  b-almost-full: b-almost-full(n,m.R[n; m]),  strict-inc: StrictInc,  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  int_upper: {i...},  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  true: True,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  strict-inc: StrictInc,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  int_upper: {i...},  prop: ℙ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  b-almost-full: b-almost-full(n,m.R[n; m]),  compose: f o g,  le: A ≤ B,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b)
Lemmas referenced :  false_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  less_than_wf,  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_properties,  lelt_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  intformless_wf,  decidable__lt,  implies-quotient-true,  compose-strict-inc,  b-almost-full_wf,  strict-inc_wf,  nat_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  le_wf,  int_upper_properties,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  int_upper_wf,  exists_wf,  intuitionistic-pigeonhole
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  lemma_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  isectElimination,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  setEquality,  intEquality,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageElimination,  productEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}R,T:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}.
    (b-almost-full(n,m.R[n;m])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  b-almost-full(n,m.T[n;m])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}s:StrictInc.  \00D9(\mexists{}m:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}n,p:\{m  +  1...\}.  (R[s  m;s  n]  \mwedge{}  T[s  m;s  p]))))



Date html generated: 2016_05_14-PM-09_51_16
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_15-PM-10_58_12

Theory : continuity


Home Index