Nuprl Lemma : polyconst-val

∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[l:{l:ℤ List| ||l|| = n ∈ ℤ} ]. ∀[k:ℤ].  (polyconst(n;k)@l ~ k)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  polyconst: polyconst(n;k),  poly-int-val: p@l,  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  int: ℤ,  sqequal: s ~ t,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  has-value: (a)↓,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  select: L[n],  sum_aux: sum_aux(k;v;i;x.f[x]),  sum: Σ(f[x] | x < k),  subtract: n - m,  bfalse: ff,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  sq_type: SQType(T),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  poly-int-val: p@l,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  cons: [a / b],  or: P ∨ Q,  polyconst: polyconst(n;k),  so_apply: x[s],  guard: {T},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  uimplies: b supposing a,  ge: i ≥ j ,  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  nat: ℕ,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  int-value-type,  value-type-has-value,  false_wf,  add-is-int-iff,  exp0_lemma,  spread_cons_lemma,  null_cons_lemma,  poly_int_val_cons_cons,  iff_weakening_equal,  equal_wf,  poly_int_val_nil_cons,  subtype_base_sq,  decidable__equal_int,  null_nil_lemma,  nat_wf,  list_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base-T,  int_subtype_base,  length_of_nil_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  intformeq_wf,  decidable__lt,  non_neg_length,  length_wf,  le_weakening2,  length_of_cons_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  list-cases,  less_than_irreflexivity,  less_than_transitivity1,  equal-wf-base,  list_wf,  set_wf,  less_than_wf,  ge_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  nat_properties
Rules used in proof :  multiplyEquality,  addEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  sqleReflexivity,  callbyvalueReduce,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  productElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  promote_hyp,  unionElimination,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  baseClosed,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  sqequalAxiom,  independent_functionElimination,  computeAll,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalRule,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaFormation,  intWeakElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[l:\{l:\mBbbZ{}  List|  ||l||  =  n\}  ].  \mforall{}[k:\mBbbZ{}].    (polyconst(n;k)@l  \msim{}  k)



Date html generated: 2017_04_20-AM-07_10_34
Last ObjectModification: 2017_04_17-PM-02_10_15

Theory : list_1


Home Index