Nuprl Lemma : bag-co-restrict-rep

[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x:T]. ∀[n:ℕ].  ((bag-rep(n;x)|¬x) {})


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-co-restrict: (b|¬x) bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x) empty-bag: {} deq: EqDecider(T) nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] universe: Type sqequal: t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  member: t ∈ T top: Top bag-co-restrict: (b|¬x) all: x:A. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] deq: EqDecider(T) implies:  Q bool: 𝔹 unit: Unit it: btrue: tt uall: [x:A]. B[x] uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q uimplies: supposing a eqof: eqof(d) bnot: ¬bb ifthenelse: if then else fi  bfalse: ff exists: x:A. B[x] prop: or: P ∨ Q sq_type: SQType(T) guard: {T} assert: b false: False not: ¬A nat: ge: i ≥  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x) eq_int: (i =z j) subtract: m empty-bag: {} nil: [] bag-filter: [x∈b|p[x]] filter: filter(P;l) cons: [a b] reduce: reduce(f;k;as) list_ind: list_ind bottom: so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]) so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4] strict4: strict4(F) has-value: (a)↓ squash: T decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced :  bag_filter_cons_lemma bool_wf eqtt_to_assert safe-assert-deq eqff_to_assert equal_wf bool_cases_sqequal subtype_base_sq bool_subtype_base assert-bnot nat_wf deq_wf nat_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermVar_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_formula_prop_wf ge_wf less_than_wf primrec-unroll lifting-strict-decide top_wf has-value_wf_base base_wf is-exception_wf decidable__le subtract_wf intformnot_wf itermSubtract_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_term_value_subtract_lemma eq_int_wf assert_of_eq_int intformeq_wf int_formula_prop_eq_lemma neg_assert_of_eq_int
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity natural_numberEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality hypothesisEquality because_Cache sqequalRule cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution dependent_functionElimination thin hypothesis applyEquality setElimination rename lambdaFormation unionElimination equalityElimination isectElimination equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry productElimination independent_isectElimination dependent_pairFormation promote_hyp instantiate cumulativity independent_functionElimination universeEquality isect_memberFormation intWeakElimination lambdaEquality int_eqEquality intEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll sqequalAxiom baseClosed callbyvalueDecide unionEquality sqleReflexivity baseApply closedConclusion decideExceptionCases inrFormation imageMemberEquality imageElimination exceptionSqequal inlFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[x:T].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].    ((bag-rep(n;x)|\mneg{}x)  \msim{}  \{\})



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_52_49
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_32_06

Theory : bags_2


Home Index