Nuprl Lemma : bag-co-restrict-rep
∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x:T]. ∀[n:ℕ].  ((bag-rep(n;x)|¬x) ~ {})
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
bag-co-restrict: (b|¬x)
, 
bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x)
, 
empty-bag: {}
, 
deq: EqDecider(T)
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
universe: Type
, 
sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
member: t ∈ T
, 
top: Top
, 
bag-co-restrict: (b|¬x)
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
deq: EqDecider(T)
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
btrue: tt
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
eqof: eqof(d)
, 
bnot: ¬bb
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
guard: {T}
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x)
, 
eq_int: (i =z j)
, 
subtract: n - m
, 
empty-bag: {}
, 
nil: []
, 
bag-filter: [x∈b|p[x]]
, 
filter: filter(P;l)
, 
cons: [a / b]
, 
reduce: reduce(f;k;as)
, 
list_ind: list_ind, 
bottom: ⊥
, 
so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w])
, 
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4]
, 
strict4: strict4(F)
, 
has-value: (a)↓
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced : 
bag_filter_cons_lemma, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
safe-assert-deq, 
eqff_to_assert, 
equal_wf, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
nat_wf, 
deq_wf, 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
ge_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
primrec-unroll, 
lifting-strict-decide, 
top_wf, 
has-value_wf_base, 
base_wf, 
is-exception_wf, 
decidable__le, 
subtract_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_term_value_subtract_lemma, 
eq_int_wf, 
assert_of_eq_int, 
intformeq_wf, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
neg_assert_of_eq_int
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
natural_numberEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
hypothesisEquality, 
because_Cache, 
sqequalRule, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesis, 
applyEquality, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
lambdaFormation, 
unionElimination, 
equalityElimination, 
isectElimination, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
productElimination, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
independent_functionElimination, 
universeEquality, 
isect_memberFormation, 
intWeakElimination, 
lambdaEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
independent_pairFormation, 
computeAll, 
sqequalAxiom, 
baseClosed, 
callbyvalueDecide, 
unionEquality, 
sqleReflexivity, 
baseApply, 
closedConclusion, 
decideExceptionCases, 
inrFormation, 
imageMemberEquality, 
imageElimination, 
exceptionSqequal, 
inlFormation
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[x:T].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].    ((bag-rep(n;x)|\mneg{}x)  \msim{}  \{\})
Date html generated:
2018_05_21-PM-09_52_49
Last ObjectModification:
2017_07_26-PM-06_32_06
Theory : bags_2
Home
Index