Nuprl Lemma : pa-add_functionality

∀[p:{2...}]. ∀[x1,y1,x2,y2:basic-padic(p)].
  (pa-add(p;x1;y1) = pa-add(p;x2;y2) ∈ padic(p)) supposing (bpa-equiv(p;x1;x2) and bpa-equiv(p;y1;y2))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  pa-add: pa-add(p;x;y),  padic: padic(p),  bpa-equiv: bpa-equiv(p;x;y),  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  int_upper: {i...},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  int_upper: {i...},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  pa-add: pa-add(p;x;y),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  bpa-equiv: bpa-equiv(p;x;y),  bpa-add: bpa-add(p;x;y),  cand: A c∧ B,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  has-value: (a)↓,  le: A ≤ B,  guard: {T},  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
Lemmas referenced :  equal-padics,  pa-add_wf,  bpa-equiv-iff-norm,  bpa-add_wf,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-less_than,  imax_ub,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  istype-le,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  imax_wf,  fastexp_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  bpa-equiv_wf,  basic-padic_wf,  istype-int_upper,  imax_nat,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  p-adics_wf,  p-int_wf,  exp_wf2,  p-mul_wf,  p-add_wf,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  p-distrib,  nat_plus_wf,  p-mul-assoc,  exp-fastexp,  p-mul-int,  subtype_rel_self,  exp_add,  iff_weakening_equal,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  istype-nat,  decidable__equal_int
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :memTop,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  voidElimination,  inlFormation_alt,  inrFormation_alt,  callbyvalueReduce,  intEquality,  inhabitedIsType,  lambdaFormation_alt,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalityIstype,  productIsType,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  addEquality,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}[p:\{2...\}].  \mforall{}[x1,y1,x2,y2:basic-padic(p)].
    (pa-add(p;x1;y1)  =  pa-add(p;x2;y2))  supposing  (bpa-equiv(p;x1;x2)  and  bpa-equiv(p;y1;y2))



Date html generated: 2020_05_19-PM-10_08_57
Last ObjectModification: 2020_01_08-PM-06_54_20

Theory : rings_1


Home Index