Nuprl Lemma : min-increasing-sequence-prop1

∀b:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ∀n,x,k:ℕ.  ((min-increasing-sequence(b;n;x) = (inl k) ∈ (ℕ?)) ⇒ (x ≤ (b k)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  min-increasing-sequence: min-increasing-sequence(a;n;k),  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  unit: Unit,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  inl: inl x,  union: left + right,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  isl: isl(x),  min-increasing-sequence: min-increasing-sequence(a;n;k),  exposed-bfalse: exposed-bfalse,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  istype-less_than,  le_witness_for_triv,  unit_wf2,  min-increasing-sequence_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-le,  union_subtype_base,  nat_wf,  set_subtype_base,  le_wf,  int_subtype_base,  unit_subtype_base,  subtract-1-ge-0,  istype-nat,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  bfalse_wf,  btrue_wf,  primrec0_lemma,  primrec-unroll,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  less_than_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  le_int_wf,  assert_of_le_int
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :universeIsType,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  Error :functionIsTypeImplies,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :equalityIstype,  Error :unionIsType,  because_Cache,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  unionElimination,  applyEquality,  intEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  Error :functionIsType,  applyLambdaEquality,  Error :equalityIsType4,  Error :productIsType,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}b:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}n,x,k:\mBbbN{}.    ((min-increasing-sequence(b;n;x)  =  (inl  k))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (x  \mleq{}  (b  k)))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-03_07_13
Last ObjectModification: 2018_12_06-PM-11_57_09

Theory : continuity


Home Index