Nuprl Lemma : permutation-generators3

∀n:ℕ
  ∀[P:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)}  ⟶ ℙ]
    (P[λx.x]
    ⇒ (∀f:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)} . ∀i,j:ℕn.  P[f] ⇒ P[f o (i, j)] supposing i < j)
    ⇒ (∀f:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)} . P[f]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  flip: (i, j),  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  compose: f o g,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  top: Top,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  guard: {T},  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  compose-flips: compose-flips(flips),  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  compose: f o g
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  identity-injection,  less_than_wf,  isect_wf,  all_wf,  inject_wf,  int_seg_wf,  set_wf,  permutation-generators2,  lelt_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__lt,  nat_properties,  false_wf,  member-less_than,  iff_weakening_equal,  inject-compose,  rotate-injection,  rotate-as-flips,  equal_wf,  compose_wf,  list_wf,  compose-flips_wf,  compose-flips-injection,  reduce_cons_lemma,  map_cons_lemma,  reduce_nil_lemma,  map_nil_lemma,  list_induction,  sq_stable__inject,  flip-injection,  flip_wf,  comp_assoc,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  flip_symmetry,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  int_seg_properties,  flip_identity
Rules used in proof :  cumulativity,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  setEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  lambdaEquality,  sqequalRule,  because_Cache,  rename,  setElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  functionEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  isectElimination,  isect_memberFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  cut,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  approximateComputation,  unionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  applyLambdaEquality,  productElimination,  productEquality,  levelHypothesis,  hyp_replacement,  addLevel,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}
    \mforall{}[P:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}]
        (P[\mlambda{}x.x]
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}  .  \mforall{}i,j:\mBbbN{}n.    P[f]  {}\mRightarrow{}  P[f  o  (i,  j)]  supposing  i  <  j)
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}  .  P[f]))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-00_42_43
Last ObjectModification: 2017_12_10-PM-03_57_02

Theory : list_1


Home Index