Nuprl Lemma : bag-summation-equal-implies-all-equal-1

∀[T:Type]. ∀[b:bag(T)]. ∀[f,g:T ⟶ ℤ].
  (∀x:T. (x ↓∈ b ⇒ (f[x] = g[x] ∈ ℤ))) supposing ((Σ(x∈b). g[x] ≤ Σ(x∈b). f[x]) and (∀x:T. (x ↓∈ b ⇒ (f[x] ≤ g[x]))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-member: x ↓∈ bs,  bag-summation: Σ(x∈b). f[x],  bag: bag(T),  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  and: P ∧ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  squash: ↓T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  cand: A c∧ B,  infix_ap: x f y,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  assoc: Assoc(T;op),  comm: Comm(T;op),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  empty-bag: {},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bag-summation: Σ(x∈b). f[x],  bag-accum: bag-accum(v,x.f[v; x];init;bs),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  cons-bag: x.b,  monoid_p: IsMonoid(T;op;id),  ident: Ident(T;op;id),  true: True,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  sq_or: a ↓∨ b
Lemmas referenced :  bag_to_squash_list,  bag-member_wf,  le_wf,  bag-summation_wf,  all_wf,  bag_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  list_induction,  list-subtype-bag,  equal_wf,  list_wf,  bag-member-empty-iff,  empty-bag_wf,  list_accum_nil_lemma,  bag-member-cons,  cons-bag_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  bag-summation-cons,  iff_weakening_equal,  decidable__le,  add-is-int-iff,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  false_wf,  bag-summation_functionality_wrt_le,  and_wf
Rules used in proof :  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  productElimination,  thin,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  hypothesisEquality,  imageElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  sqequalRule,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  functionEquality,  rename,  dependent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  universeEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  inlFormation,  pointwiseFunctionality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  inrFormation,  setElimination,  setEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[b:bag(T)].  \mforall{}[f,g:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].
    (\mforall{}x:T.  (x  \mdownarrow{}\mmember{}  b  {}\mRightarrow{}  (f[x]  =  g[x])))  supposing 
          ((\mSigma{}(x\mmember{}b).  g[x]  \mleq{}  \mSigma{}(x\mmember{}b).  f[x])  and 
          (\mforall{}x:T.  (x  \mdownarrow{}\mmember{}  b  {}\mRightarrow{}  (f[x]  \mleq{}  g[x]))))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-09_02_38
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_43_44

Theory : bags


Home Index