Nuprl Lemma : triple-cross-product-zero

∀r:CRng. ∀a,p,q:ℕ3 ⟶ |r|.  (((p . a) = 0 ∈ |r|) ⇒ ((q . a) = 0 ∈ |r|) ⇒ ((a x (p x q)) = 0 ∈ (ℕ3 ⟶ |r|)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  scalar-product: (a . b),  cross-product: (a x b),  zero-vector: 0,  int_seg: {i..j-},  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T,  crng: CRng,  rng_zero: 0,  rng_car: |r|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  int_seg: {i..j-},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  zero-vector: 0,  cross-product: (a x b),  select: L[n],  cons: [a / b],  subtract: n - m,  and: P ∧ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  crng: CRng,  rng: Rng,  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  infix_ap: x f y,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  int_seg_properties,  int_seg_subtype,  false_wf,  int_seg_cases,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_seg_wf,  equal_wf,  rng_car_wf,  scalar-product_wf,  le_wf,  rng_zero_wf,  crng_wf,  rng_plus_wf,  lelt_wf,  infix_ap_wf,  rng_times_wf,  rng_minus_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  rng_times_over_plus,  rng_times_over_minus,  subtype_rel_self,  rng_minus_over_plus,  rng_minus_minus,  rng_plus_assoc,  iff_weakening_equal,  rng_plus_ac_1,  rng_plus_comm,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  rng_times_zero,  rng_minus_zero,  rng_plus_zero,  scalar-product-3,  crng_times_comm,  crng_times_ac_1,  rng_plus_inv_assoc
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  functionExtensionality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  sqequalRule,  hypothesis_subsumption,  addEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyEquality,  functionEquality,  equalityUniverse,  levelHypothesis,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}r:CRng.  \mforall{}a,p,q:\mBbbN{}3  {}\mrightarrow{}  |r|.    (((p  .  a)  =  0)  {}\mRightarrow{}  ((q  .  a)  =  0)  {}\mRightarrow{}  ((a  x  (p  x  q))  =  0))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_44_17
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-PM-04_35_16

Theory : matrices


Home Index