Nuprl Lemma : callbyvalueall-seq-fun1

∀[L,K,G,F:Top]. ∀[n,m:ℕ]. ∀[k1,k2:ℕn + 1].
  (callbyvalueall-seq(λi.if i <z k1 then L[i] else K[i] fi ;G;F;n;m) ~ callbyvalueall-seq(λi.if i <z k2
                                                                                             then L[i]
                                                                                             else K[i]
                                                                                             fi ;G;F;n;m))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  callbyvalueall-seq: callbyvalueall-seq(L;G;F;n;m),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  lt_int: i <z j,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  lambda: λx.A[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  callbyvalueall-seq: callbyvalueall-seq(L;G;F;n;m),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  equal_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_wf,  nat_wf,  le_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  lt_int_wf,  assert_of_lt_int,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  top_wf
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp,  isect_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[L,K,G,F:Top].  \mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[k1,k2:\mBbbN{}n  +  1].
    (callbyvalueall-seq(\mlambda{}i.if  i  <z  k1  then  L[i]  else  K[i]  fi  ;G;F;n;m) 
    \msim{}  callbyvalueall-seq(\mlambda{}i.if  i  <z  k2  then  L[i]  else  K[i]  fi  ;G;F;n;m))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-06_21_56
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-PM-05_28_34

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index