Nuprl Lemma : csm-composition-comp

∀[X,Y,Z:j⊢]. ∀[s1:Z j⟶ Y]. ∀[s2:Y j⟶ X]. ∀[A:{X ⊢ _}]. ∀[comp:X ⊢ CompOp(A)].
  (((comp)s2)s1 = (comp)s2 o s1 ∈ Z ⊢ CompOp((A)s2 o s1))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  csm-composition: (comp)sigma,  composition-op: Gamma ⊢ CompOp(A),  csm-ap-type: (AF)s,  cubical-type: {X ⊢ _},  csm-comp: G o F,  cube_set_map: A ⟶ B,  cubical_set: CubicalSet,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  cube_set_map: A ⟶ B,  psc_map: A ⟶ B,  nat-trans: nat-trans(C;D;F;G),  cat-ob: cat-ob(C),  pi1: fst(t),  op-cat: op-cat(C),  spreadn: spread4,  cube-cat: CubeCat,  fset: fset(T),  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  cat-arrow: cat-arrow(C),  pi2: snd(t),  type-cat: TypeCat,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  cat-comp: cat-comp(C),  compose: f o g,  uimplies: b supposing a,  squash: ↓T,  cubical-type: {X ⊢ _},  csm-comp: G o F,  csm-ap-type: (AF)s,  csm-ap: (s)x,  true: True,  composition-op: Gamma ⊢ CompOp(A),  csm-composition: (comp)sigma,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  equal-composition-op,  csm-ap-type_wf,  csm-comp_wf,  csm-composition_wf,  cubical_set_cumulativity-i-j,  subtype_rel_self,  cube_set_map_wf,  cubical-type-cumulativity2,  subtype_rel-equal,  composition-op_wf,  cubical-path-0_wf,  cubical-term_wf,  cubical-subset_wf,  add-name_wf,  cube-set-restriction_wf,  face-presheaf_wf2,  nc-s_wf,  f-subset-add-name,  cubical-type-cumulativity,  formal-cube_wf1,  subset-iota_wf,  context-map_wf,  I_cube_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-le,  nat_wf,  not_wf,  fset-member_wf,  int-deq_wf,  strong-subtype-deq-subtype,  strong-subtype-set3,  le_wf,  strong-subtype-self,  fset_wf,  cubical-type_wf,  cubical_set_wf,  csm-cubical-path-0-subtype,  csm-ap-csm-comp,  csm-ap_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  equal_wf,  csm-ap-comp-type,  iff_weakening_equal,  csm-comp-context-map,  istype-universe,  csm-cubical-path-1-subtype
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  instantiate,  applyEquality,  sqequalRule,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaEquality_alt,  imageElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  productElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  inhabitedIsType,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :memTop,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  voidElimination,  setEquality,  intEquality,  lambdaFormation_alt,  equalityIstype,  hyp_replacement,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[X,Y,Z:j\mvdash{}].  \mforall{}[s1:Z  j{}\mrightarrow{}  Y].  \mforall{}[s2:Y  j{}\mrightarrow{}  X].  \mforall{}[A:\{X  \mvdash{}  \_\}].  \mforall{}[comp:X  \mvdash{}  CompOp(A)].
    (((comp)s2)s1  =  (comp)s2  o  s1)



Date html generated: 2020_05_20-PM-03_52_05
Last ObjectModification: 2020_04_09-PM-01_31_49

Theory : cubical!type!theory


Home Index