Nuprl Lemma : not-decidable-zero-sequence
¬(∀s:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ((s = (λx.0) ∈ (ℕ ⟶ ℕ)) ∨ (¬(s = (λx.0) ∈ (ℕ ⟶ ℕ)))))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
nat: ℕ, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x], 
not: ¬A, 
or: P ∨ Q, 
lambda: λx.A[x], 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x], 
natural_number: $n, 
equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
not: ¬A, 
implies: P ⇒ Q, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x], 
member: t ∈ T, 
or: P ∨ Q, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x], 
prop: ℙ, 
nat: ℕ, 
le: A ≤ B, 
and: P ∧ Q, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b), 
false: False, 
half-squash-stable: half-squash-stable(P), 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x], 
so_apply: x[s], 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x], 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B, 
guard: {T}, 
bool: 𝔹, 
unit: Unit, 
it: ⋅, 
btrue: tt, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q), 
uimplies: b supposing a, 
less_than: a < b, 
top: Top, 
true: True, 
squash: ↓T, 
bfalse: ff, 
sq_type: SQType(T), 
bnot: ¬bb, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi , 
assert: ↑b, 
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q, 
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q, 
int_seg: {i..j-}, 
ge: i ≥ j , 
lelt: i ≤ j < k, 
decidable: Dec(P), 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
Lemmas referenced : 
nat_wf, 
not_wf, 
equal-wf-T-base, 
strong-continuity2-implies-weak, 
istype-false, 
le_wf, 
sq_stable-implies-half-squash-stable, 
false_wf, 
sq_stable_from_decidable, 
decidable__false, 
implies-quotient-true, 
exists_wf, 
all_wf, 
equal-wf-base-T, 
equal-wf-base, 
int_seg_wf, 
int_subtype_base, 
lt_int_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_lt_int, 
istype-top, 
istype-void, 
eqff_to_assert, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_wf, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
iff_weakening_uiff, 
assert_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
int_seg_properties, 
nat_properties, 
decidable__equal_int, 
full-omega-unsat, 
intformnot_wf, 
intformeq_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
istype-int, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
set_subtype_base, 
lelt_wf, 
intformand_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
subtype_rel_function, 
int_seg_subtype_nat, 
subtype_rel_self, 
less_than_anti-reflexive
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
Error :lambdaFormation_alt, 
rename, 
sqequalRule, 
Error :functionIsType, 
Error :universeIsType, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
hypothesis, 
Error :inhabitedIsType, 
hypothesisEquality, 
Error :unionIsType, 
Error :equalityIsType3, 
thin, 
baseClosed, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
functionEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
Error :lambdaEquality_alt, 
because_Cache, 
unionElimination, 
Error :equalityIsType1, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
independent_functionElimination, 
Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt, 
natural_numberEquality, 
independent_pairFormation, 
productElimination, 
Error :productIsType, 
Error :equalityIsType2, 
setElimination, 
Error :equalityIsType4, 
applyEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
voidElimination, 
equalityElimination, 
independent_isectElimination, 
lessCases, 
Error :isect_memberFormation_alt, 
axiomSqEquality, 
Error :isect_memberEquality_alt, 
imageMemberEquality, 
imageElimination, 
Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt, 
baseApply, 
closedConclusion, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
Error :functionExtensionality_alt, 
approximateComputation, 
intEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
applyLambdaEquality
Latex:
\mneg{}(\mforall{}s:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  ((s  =  (\mlambda{}x.0))  \mvee{}  (\mneg{}(s  =  (\mlambda{}x.0)))))
Date html generated:
2019_06_20-PM-02_56_57
Last ObjectModification:
2018_10_05-PM-08_21_08
Theory : continuity
Home
Index