Nuprl Lemma : not-decidable-zero-sequence

¬(∀s:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ((s = (λx.0) ∈ (ℕ ⟶ ℕ)) ∨ (¬(s = (λx.0) ∈ (ℕ ⟶ ℕ)))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  or: P ∨ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  half-squash-stable: half-squash-stable(P),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  less_than: a < b,  top: Top,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  strong-continuity2-implies-weak,  istype-false,  le_wf,  sq_stable-implies-half-squash-stable,  false_wf,  sq_stable_from_decidable,  decidable__false,  implies-quotient-true,  exists_wf,  all_wf,  equal-wf-base-T,  equal-wf-base,  int_seg_wf,  int_subtype_base,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  istype-top,  istype-void,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  set_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  subtype_rel_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  subtype_rel_self,  less_than_anti-reflexive
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  rename,  sqequalRule,  Error :functionIsType,  Error :universeIsType,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  hypothesisEquality,  Error :unionIsType,  Error :equalityIsType3,  thin,  baseClosed,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  functionEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  Error :equalityIsType1,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  Error :productIsType,  Error :equalityIsType2,  setElimination,  Error :equalityIsType4,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  voidElimination,  equalityElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  lessCases,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  axiomSqEquality,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  Error :functionExtensionality_alt,  approximateComputation,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mneg{}(\mforall{}s:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  ((s  =  (\mlambda{}x.0))  \mvee{}  (\mneg{}(s  =  (\mlambda{}x.0)))))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_56_57
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_05-PM-08_21_08

Theory : continuity


Home Index