Nuprl Lemma : strong-continuity-rel-unique

∀P:(ℕ ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℕ ⟶ ℙ. ∀F:∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ⇃(∃n:ℕ. (P f n)).
  ⇃(∃M:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ (ℕn?)
     ∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ∃n:ℕ. ∃k:ℕn. ((P f k) ∧ ((M n f) = (inl k) ∈ (ℕ?)) ∧ (∀m:ℕ. ((↑isl(M m f)) ⇒ (m = n ∈ ℕ)))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  isl: isl(x),  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  true: True,  unit: Unit,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  inl: inl x,  union: left + right,  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  axiom-choice-1X-quot,  nat_wf,  prop-truncation-quot,  exists_wf,  int_seg_wf,  unit_wf2,  all_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  equal_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  subtype_rel_self,  subtype_rel_union,  assert_wf,  isl_wf,  implies-quotient-true,  quotient_wf,  true_wf,  equiv_rel_true,  strong-continuity2-no-inner-squash-unique-bound,  less_than_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  lelt_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  isectElimination,  functionEquality,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  unionEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  productEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  inlEquality,  productElimination,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll

Latex:
\mforall{}P:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}.  \mforall{}F:\mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \00D9(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (P  f  n)).
    \00D9(\mexists{}M:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n?)
          \mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}k:\mBbbN{}n.  ((P  f  k)  \mwedge{}  ((M  n  f)  =  (inl  k))  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  ((\muparrow{}isl(M  m  f))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (m  =  n)))))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-10_02_33
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_54_02

Theory : continuity


Home Index