Nuprl Lemma : unsquashed-monotone-bar-induction8-false

¬(∀Q:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℙ
    ((∀n:ℕ. ∀s:ℕn ⟶ ℕ.  ((∀m:ℕ. Q[n + 1;s.m@n]) ⇒ Q[n;s])) ⇒ (∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ⇃(∃n:ℕ. ∀m:{n...}. Q[m;f])) ⇒ Q[0;λx.⊥]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  seq-add: s.x@n,  int_upper: {i...},  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  bottom: ⊥,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  true: True,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  so_apply: x[s],  int_upper: {i...},  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than: a < b
Lemmas referenced :  unsquashed-weak-continuity-false2,  nat_wf,  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  seq-add_wf,  quotient_wf,  exists_wf,  int_upper_wf,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  true_wf,  equiv_rel_true,  int_seg_properties,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  equal_wf,  rep-seq-from_wf,  int_upper_properties,  int_upper_subtype_int_upper,  rep-seq-from-prop3,  squash_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  strong-continuity2-implies-weak,  implies-quotient-true,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  rep-seq-from-prop1,  rep-seq-from-0
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  independent_functionElimination,  thin,  functionEquality,  hypothesis,  voidElimination,  instantiate,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  universeEquality,  sqequalRule,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  productElimination,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mneg{}(\mforall{}Q:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}
        ((\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}s:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.    ((\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  Q[n  +  1;s.m@n])  {}\mRightarrow{}  Q[n;s]))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \00D9(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}m:\{n...\}.  Q[m;f]))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  Q[0;\mlambda{}x.\mbot{}]))



Date html generated: 2017_04_20-AM-07_21_25
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_57_33

Theory : continuity


Home Index