Nuprl Lemma : list_decomp_last

∀[T:Type]. ∀L:T List. ∃L':T List. (L = (L' @ [last(L)]) ∈ (T List)) supposing 0 < ||L||


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  last: last(L),  length: ||as||,  append: as @ bs,  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  list: T List,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  and: P ∧ Q,  cons: [a / b],  top: Top,  bfalse: ff,  not: ¬A,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  append: as @ bs,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  guard: {T},  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
Lemmas referenced :  member-less_than,  length_wf,  list_induction,  less_than_wf,  exists_wf,  list_wf,  equal_wf,  append_wf,  cons_wf,  last_wf,  list-cases,  null_nil_lemma,  length_of_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  null_cons_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  false_wf,  nil_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  length-zero-implies-sq-nil,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  last_singleton,  iff_weakening_equal,  bfalse_wf,  assert_elim,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  assert_wf,  null_wf,  decidable__lt,  add-is-int-iff,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  last_cons,  list_ind_cons_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  independent_isectElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  voidElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  addEquality,  universeEquality,  applyEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  addLevel,  levelHypothesis,  pointwiseFunctionality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  equalityUniverse

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}L:T  List.  \mexists{}L':T  List.  (L  =  (L'  @  [last(L)]))  supposing  0  <  ||L||



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_44_46
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_02_38

Theory : list_1


Home Index