Nuprl Lemma : dense-in-reals-implies-accel

∀X:ℝ ⟶ ℙ
  (dense-in-interval((-∞, ∞);X)
  ⇒ (∀x:ℝ. ∀y:{y:ℝ| y = x} .  ((X x) ⇒ (X y)))
  ⇒ (∀x:ℝ. ∀k:ℕ+.  ∃y:ℝ. ((y = accelerate(3;x) ∈ (ℕ+k ⟶ ℤ)) ∧ (X y))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  dense-in-interval: dense-in-interval(I;X),  riiint: (-∞, ∞),  req: x = y,  accelerate: accelerate(k;f),  real: ℝ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  istype: istype(T),  rless: x < y,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  guard: {T},  rneq: x ≠ y,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  real: ℝ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  true: True,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  sq_type: SQType(T)
Lemmas referenced :  dense-in-reals-iff,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermVar_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-less_than,  nat_plus_wf,  real_wf,  req_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  dense-in-interval_wf,  riiint_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  i-member_wf,  member_riiint_lemma,  blended-real-req,  rleq_weakening_rless,  rabs_wf,  rsub_wf,  rdiv_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rless-int,  rless_wf,  blended-real-agrees,  blended-real_wf,  int_seg_wf,  subtype_rel_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat_plus,  istype-false,  accelerate_wf,  rneq-int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  set_subtype_base,  less_than_wf,  int_subtype_base,  div-cancel2,  subtype_base_sq,  nequal_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  multiplyEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  isectElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  functionIsType,  setIsType,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  cumulativity,  setEquality,  closedConclusion,  inrFormation_alt,  productIsType,  equalityIstype,  intEquality,  baseApply,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  equalitySymmetry,  functionExtensionality,  equalityTransitivity

Latex:
\mforall{}X:\mBbbR{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}
    (dense-in-interval((-\minfty{},  \minfty{});X)
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:\mBbbR{}.  \mforall{}y:\{y:\mBbbR{}|  y  =  x\}  .    ((X  x)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (X  y)))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:\mBbbR{}.  \mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.    \mexists{}y:\mBbbR{}.  ((y  =  accelerate(3;x))  \mwedge{}  (X  y))))



Date html generated: 2019_10_30-AM-07_20_30
Last ObjectModification: 2019_01_31-AM-11_44_33

Theory : reals


Home Index