Nuprl Lemma : strong-continuity2-implies-3
∀[T:Type]. ∀[F:(ℕ ⟶ T) ⟶ ℕ].  (strong-continuity2(T;F) 
⇒ strong-continuity3(T;F))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
strong-continuity3: strong-continuity3(T;F)
, 
strong-continuity2: strong-continuity2(T;F)
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
, 
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
strong-continuity2: strong-continuity2(T;F)
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
strong-continuity3: strong-continuity3(T;F)
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
cand: A c∧ B
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
true: True
, 
guard: {T}
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
top: Top
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
isl: isl(x)
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
btrue: tt
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced : 
strong-continuity2_wf, 
nat_wf, 
strong-continuity-test_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
all_wf, 
exists_wf, 
equal_wf, 
unit_wf2, 
subtype_rel_dep_function, 
int_seg_subtype_nat, 
false_wf, 
assert_wf, 
isl_wf, 
decidable__assert, 
strong-continuity-test-prop1, 
decidable__lt, 
assert_functionality_wrt_uiff, 
squash_wf, 
true_wf, 
isr-not-isl, 
subtype_rel_union, 
top_wf, 
decidable__equal_int, 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
intformeq_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
decidable__le, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
le_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
not-isl-assert-isr, 
strong-continuity-test-prop2, 
and_wf, 
btrue_wf, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_wf, 
bool_subtype_base, 
iff_weakening_equal, 
strong-continuity-test-prop3
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
lambdaFormation, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
productElimination, 
thin, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
isectElimination, 
cumulativity, 
hypothesisEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
applyEquality, 
functionEquality, 
hypothesis, 
universeEquality, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
lambdaEquality, 
natural_numberEquality, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
because_Cache, 
sqequalRule, 
productEquality, 
unionEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
independent_pairFormation, 
inlEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
unionElimination, 
independent_functionElimination, 
imageElimination, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
computeAll, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
applyLambdaEquality, 
instantiate
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[F:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  T)  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}].    (strong-continuity2(T;F)  {}\mRightarrow{}  strong-continuity3(T;F))
Date html generated:
2017_04_17-AM-09_53_55
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-05_49_07
Theory : continuity
Home
Index