Nuprl Lemma : combine-list-permutation

∀[A:Type]. ∀[f:A ⟶ A ⟶ A].
  (∀[as,bs:A List].
     (combine-list(x,y.f[x;y];as) = combine-list(x,y.f[x;y];bs) ∈ A) supposing 
        (permutation(A;as;bs) and 
        0 < ||as||)) supposing 
     (Comm(A;λx,y. f[x;y]) and 
     Assoc(A;λx,y. f[x;y]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  permutation: permutation(T;L1;L2),  combine-list: combine-list(x,y.f[x; y];L),  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  comm: Comm(T;op),  assoc: Assoc(T;op),  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  append: as @ bs,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  permutation_wf,  less_than_wf,  length_wf,  comm_wf,  assoc_wf,  permutation-invariant,  equal_wf,  combine-list_wf,  list_wf,  append_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  length_of_cons_lemma,  non_neg_length,  decidable__lt,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  permutation-length,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  permutation_transitivity,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  permutation-rotate,  length-append,  length_of_nil_lemma,  add_nat_plus,  length_wf_nat,  nat_plus_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  add-is-int-iff,  false_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  combine-list-append,  iff_weakening_equal,  permutation_weakening,  append_functionality_wrt_permutation,  combine-list-flip,  trivial-equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  hypothesis,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  because_Cache,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  functionEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  setElimination,  rename,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  imageElimination,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[f:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  A  {}\mrightarrow{}  A].
    (\mforall{}[as,bs:A  List].
          (combine-list(x,y.f[x;y];as)  =  combine-list(x,y.f[x;y];bs))  supposing 
                (permutation(A;as;bs)  and 
                0  <  ||as||))  supposing 
          (Comm(A;\mlambda{}x,y.  f[x;y])  and 
          Assoc(A;\mlambda{}x,y.  f[x;y]))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_22_58
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_44_41

Theory : list_1


Home Index