Nuprl Lemma : count-append

∀[A:Type]. ∀[P:A ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[L1,L2:A List].  (count(P;L1 @ L2) ~ count(P;L1) + count(P;L2))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  count: count(P;L),  append: as @ bs,  list: T List,  bool: 𝔹,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  universe: Type,  sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  count: count(P;L),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  top: Top,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  cons: [a / b],  colength: colength(L),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  reduce-append,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  nat_wf,  colength_wf_list,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  list-cases,  reduce_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  le_wf,  equal_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  reduce_cons_lemma,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  add-associates,  reduce_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  list_wf,  zero-add,  ifthenelse_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  hypothesis,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalAxiom,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  imageElimination,  functionExtensionality,  equalityElimination,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  isect_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[P:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[L1,L2:A  List].    (count(P;L1  @  L2)  \msim{}  count(P;L1)  +  count(P;L2))



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-09_28_08
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_01_45

Theory : list_1


Home Index