Nuprl Lemma : list-decomp-nat

∀[T:Type]. ∀L:T List. ∀i:ℕ||L|| + 1.  ∃K,J:T List. ((L = (K @ J) ∈ (T List)) ∧ (||K|| = i ∈ ℤ))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  length: ||as||,  append: as @ bs,  list: T List,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  append: as @ bs,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  cand: A c∧ B,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  list_induction,  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  length_wf,  exists_wf,  list_wf,  equal_wf,  append_wf,  length-append,  length_of_nil_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  int_seg_properties,  int_seg_subtype,  false_wf,  int_seg_cases,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  length_of_cons_lemma,  nil_wf,  cons_wf,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  equal-wf-base-T,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  decidable__lt,  add-is-int-iff,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  lelt_wf,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  append_back_nil,  equal-wf-base,  equal-wf-T-base
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  cumulativity,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  productEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  hypothesis_subsumption,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  baseClosed,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  imageElimination,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  applyEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}L:T  List.  \mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}||L||  +  1.    \mexists{}K,J:T  List.  ((L  =  (K  @  J))  \mwedge{}  (||K||  =  i))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_45_02
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_04_53

Theory : list_1


Home Index