Nuprl Lemma : pigeon-hole-implies2

∀n:ℕ
  ∀[m:ℕ]
    ∀f:ℕn ⟶ ℕm. ∀g:ℕn ⟶ ℕm. ∃i:ℕn. (∃j:ℕn [((f i) = (g j) ∈ ℤ)]) supposing Inj(ℕn;ℕm;g) supposing Inj(ℕn;ℕm;f) 
    supposing m < 2 * n


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  multiply: n * m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  less_than: a < b,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  guard: {T},  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  member-less_than,  equal_wf,  int_seg_wf,  pigeon-hole-implies-ext,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  lelt_wf,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_properties,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  decidable__lt,  lt_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  top_wf,  sq_stable__equal,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  inject_wf,  nat_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  sq_exists_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  multiplyEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  lessCases,  baseClosed,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageMemberEquality,  axiomSqEquality,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  functionExtensionality,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  functionEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}
    \mforall{}[m:\mBbbN{}]
        \mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}m
            \mforall{}g:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}m.  \mexists{}i:\mBbbN{}n.  (\mexists{}j:\mBbbN{}n  [((f  i)  =  (g  j))])  supposing  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}m;g)  supposing  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}m;f) 
        supposing  m  <  2  *  n



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-01_32_21
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_20-PM-09_32_22

Theory : list_1


Home Index