Nuprl Lemma : countable-nsub-family

∀B:ℕ ⟶ ℕ+. ∃g:ℕ ⟶ (i:ℕ × ℕB[i]). Surj(ℕ;i:ℕ × ℕB[i];g)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  surject: Surj(A;B;f),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  product: x:A × B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  pi1: fst(t),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  surject: Surj(A;B;f),  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  bfalse: ff,  top: Top,  false: False,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  biject: Bij(A;B;f),  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  le_wf,  product_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  ifthenelse_wf,  int_seg_properties,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  intformless_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  istype-false,  less_than_wf,  assert_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases_sqequal,  eqff_to_assert,  istype-less_than,  istype-le,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-int,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  lt_int_wf,  compose_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  int_seg_wf,  compose-surjections,  nat_wf,  surject_wf,  istype-nat,  coded-pair_wf,  code-pair-bijection
Rules used in proof :  baseClosed,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  independent_pairEquality,  dependent_pairEquality_alt,  spreadEquality,  functionExtensionality,  sqequalBase,  intEquality,  imageElimination,  applyLambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  promote_hyp,  equalityIstype,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  productIsType,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  approximateComputation,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityElimination,  unionElimination,  inhabitedIsType,  functionIsType,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  rename,  setElimination,  applyEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  productEquality,  universeIsType,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  isectElimination,  lambdaEquality_alt,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  thin,  productElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}B:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  \mexists{}g:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (i:\mBbbN{}  \mtimes{}  \mBbbN{}B[i]).  Surj(\mBbbN{};i:\mBbbN{}  \mtimes{}  \mBbbN{}B[i];g)



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-10_25_40
Last ObjectModification: 2019_10_08-PM-00_38_37

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index