Nuprl Lemma : fpf-contains-union-join-left2

∀[A:Type]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type].
  ∀eq:EqDecider(A). ∀f,h,g:a:A fp-> B[a] List. ∀R:⋂a:A. ((B[a] List) ⟶ B[a] ⟶ 𝔹).
    (h ⊆⊆ f ⇒ h ⊆⊆ fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-union-join: fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g),  fpf-contains: f ⊆⊆ g,  fpf: a:A fp-> B[a],  list: T List,  deq: EqDecider(T),  bool: 𝔹,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  isect: ⋂x:A. B[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  fpf-contains: f ⊆⊆ g,  member: t ∈ T,  cand: A c∧ B,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  or: P ∨ Q,  true: True,  l_contains: A ⊆ B,  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  fpf-cap: f(x)?z,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff
Lemmas referenced :  assert_wf,  fpf-dom_wf,  subtype-fpf2,  list_wf,  top_wf,  fpf-contains_wf,  bool_wf,  fpf_wf,  deq_wf,  fpf-union-join-dom,  assert_elim,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  fpf-union-join-ap,  fpf-union-contains,  l_all_iff,  fpf-cap_wf,  nil_wf,  l_member_wf,  fpf-union_wf,  select_wf,  fpf-ap_wf,  int_seg_properties,  length_wf,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_seg_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  uiff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  equal_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  cut,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  isectEquality,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  instantiate,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  inlFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  setEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  computeAll,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(A).  \mforall{}f,h,g:a:A  fp->  B[a]  List.  \mforall{}R:\mcap{}a:A.  ((B[a]  List)  {}\mrightarrow{}  B[a]  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}).
        (h  \msubseteq{}\msubseteq{}  f  {}\mRightarrow{}  h  \msubseteq{}\msubseteq{}  fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_23_49
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_19_25

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index