Nuprl Lemma : fpf-contains-union-join-left2
∀[A:Type]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type].
  ∀eq:EqDecider(A). ∀f,h,g:a:A fp-> B[a] List. ∀R:⋂a:A. ((B[a] List) ⟶ B[a] ⟶ 𝔹).
    (h ⊆⊆ f 
⇒ h ⊆⊆ fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
fpf-union-join: fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g)
, 
fpf-contains: f ⊆⊆ g
, 
fpf: a:A fp-> B[a]
, 
list: T List
, 
deq: EqDecider(T)
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
isect: ⋂x:A. B[x]
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
, 
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
fpf-contains: f ⊆⊆ g
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
cand: A c∧ B
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
top: Top
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
guard: {T}
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
btrue: tt
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
true: True
, 
l_contains: A ⊆ B
, 
l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x])
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
less_than: a < b
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
fpf-cap: f(x)?z
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
bfalse: ff
Lemmas referenced : 
assert_wf, 
fpf-dom_wf, 
subtype-fpf2, 
list_wf, 
top_wf, 
fpf-contains_wf, 
bool_wf, 
fpf_wf, 
deq_wf, 
fpf-union-join-dom, 
assert_elim, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_subtype_base, 
fpf-union-join-ap, 
fpf-union-contains, 
l_all_iff, 
fpf-cap_wf, 
nil_wf, 
l_member_wf, 
fpf-union_wf, 
select_wf, 
fpf-ap_wf, 
int_seg_properties, 
length_wf, 
decidable__le, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
decidable__lt, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_seg_wf, 
equal-wf-T-base, 
bnot_wf, 
not_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
uiff_transitivity, 
eqff_to_assert, 
assert_of_bnot, 
equal_wf
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
lambdaFormation, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
cut, 
hypothesis, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
independent_functionElimination, 
independent_pairFormation, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
isectElimination, 
cumulativity, 
applyEquality, 
because_Cache, 
sqequalRule, 
lambdaEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
isectEquality, 
functionEquality, 
universeEquality, 
productElimination, 
instantiate, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
inlFormation, 
natural_numberEquality, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
setEquality, 
unionElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
computeAll, 
imageElimination, 
baseClosed, 
equalityElimination
Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(A).  \mforall{}f,h,g:a:A  fp->  B[a]  List.  \mforall{}R:\mcap{}a:A.  ((B[a]  List)  {}\mrightarrow{}  B[a]  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}).
        (h  \msubseteq{}\msubseteq{}  f  {}\mRightarrow{}  h  \msubseteq{}\msubseteq{}  fpf-union-join(eq;R;f;g))
Date html generated:
2018_05_21-PM-09_23_49
Last ObjectModification:
2018_02_09-AM-10_19_25
Theory : finite!partial!functions
Home
Index