Nuprl Lemma : small-sparse-rep

∀r:{-2..3-}
  (∃L:{-1..2-} List [((r = Σi<||L||.L[i]*2^i ∈ ℤ)
                    ∧ (||L|| = 2 ∈ ℤ)
                    ∧ (∀i:ℕ||L|| - 1. ((L[i] = 0 ∈ ℤ) ∨ (L[i + 1] = 0 ∈ ℤ))))])


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  power-sum: Σi<n.a[i]*x^i,  select: L[n],  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  int_seg: {i..j-},  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  minus: -n,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  int_seg: {i..j-},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  subtract: n - m,  power-sum: Σi<n.a[i]*x^i,  cand: A c∧ B,  sum: Σ(f[x] | x < k),  sum_aux: sum_aux(k;v;i;x.f[x]),  select: L[n],  cons: [a / b],  exp: i^n,  primrec: primrec(n;b;c),  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  int_seg_properties,  int_seg_subtype_special,  int_seg_cases,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_seg_wf,  cons_wf,  istype-false,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  nil_wf,  length_of_cons_lemma,  length_of_nil_lemma,  sum_wf,  select_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  decidable__lt,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  exp_wf2,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  select-cons-hd,  list_subtype_base,  set_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  length_wf_nat,  subtract_wf,  length_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  minusEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  hypothesis_subsumption,  sqequalRule,  productElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  dependent_set_memberFormation_alt,  closedConclusion,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  productIsType,  multiplyEquality,  addEquality,  applyEquality,  inlFormation_alt,  equalityIsType4,  inhabitedIsType,  baseApply,  functionIsType,  unionIsType,  inrFormation_alt

Latex:
\mforall{}r:\{-2..3\msupminus{}\}
    (\mexists{}L:\{-1..2\msupminus{}\}  List  [((r  =  \mSigma{}i<||L||.L[i]*2\^{}i)
                                        \mwedge{}  (||L||  =  2)
                                        \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}||L||  -  1.  ((L[i]  =  0)  \mvee{}  (L[i  +  1]  =  0))))])



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_27_10
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_11-PM-10_14_48

Theory : general


Home Index