Nuprl Lemma : mon_reduce_append

∀g:IMonoid. ∀as,bs:|g| List.  ((Π as @ bs) = ((Π as) * (Π bs)) ∈ |g|)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mon_reduce: mon_reduce,  append: as @ bs,  list: T List,  infix_ap: x f y,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  equal: s = t ∈ T,  imon: IMonoid,  grp_op: *,  grp_car: |g|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  imon: IMonoid,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  append: as @ bs,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  mon_reduce: mon_reduce,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  cons: [a / b],  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  colength: colength(L),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  infix_ap: x f y
Lemmas referenced :  list_wf,  grp_car_wf,  imon_wf,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  list-cases,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  reduce_nil_lemma,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  mon_reduce_wf,  mon_ident,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  product_subtype_list,  colength-cons-not-zero,  colength_wf_list,  istype-false,  le_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  subtype_base_sq,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  spread_cons_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  reduce_cons_lemma,  grp_op_wf,  append_wf,  mon_assoc,  nat_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  hypothesis,  inhabitedIsType,  hypothesisEquality,  universeIsType,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  axiomEquality,  functionIsTypeImplies,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  equalityIsType1,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalityIsType4,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  intEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}g:IMonoid.  \mforall{}as,bs:|g|  List.    ((\mPi{}  as  @  bs)  =  ((\mPi{}  as)  *  (\mPi{}  bs)))



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-01_02_13
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_08-AM-11_48_46

Theory : list_2


Home Index