Nuprl Lemma : l_tree_covariant
∀[A,B,T:Type].  l_tree(A;T) ⊆r l_tree(B;T) supposing A ⊆r B
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
l_tree: l_tree(L;T)
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
false: False
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
not: ¬A
, 
top: Top
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
guard: {T}
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
ext-eq: A ≡ B
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
btrue: tt
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
eq_atom: x =a y
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
l_tree_leaf: l_tree_leaf(val)
, 
l_tree_size: l_tree_size(p)
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
bnot: ¬bb
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
l_tree_node: l_tree_node(val;left_subtree;right_subtree)
, 
spreadn: spread3, 
cand: A c∧ B
, 
less_than: a < b
, 
squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced : 
subtype_rel_wf, 
l_tree_wf, 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
ge_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
le_wf, 
l_tree_size_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
int_seg_properties, 
decidable__le, 
subtract_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_term_value_subtract_lemma, 
decidable__equal_int, 
int_seg_subtype, 
false_wf, 
intformeq_wf, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
l_tree-ext, 
eq_atom_wf, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_eq_atom, 
subtype_base_sq, 
atom_subtype_base, 
l_tree_leaf_wf, 
eqff_to_assert, 
equal_wf, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
neg_assert_of_eq_atom, 
decidable__lt, 
itermAdd_wf, 
int_term_value_add_lemma, 
lelt_wf, 
nat_wf, 
l_tree_node_wf
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
introduction, 
cut, 
sqequalRule, 
axiomEquality, 
hypothesis, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
thin, 
cumulativity, 
hypothesisEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
because_Cache, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
lambdaFormation, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
intWeakElimination, 
natural_numberEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
lambdaEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
independent_pairFormation, 
computeAll, 
independent_functionElimination, 
applyEquality, 
productElimination, 
unionElimination, 
applyLambdaEquality, 
hypothesis_subsumption, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
promote_hyp, 
tokenEquality, 
equalityElimination, 
instantiate, 
atomEquality, 
imageElimination, 
addEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B,T:Type].    l\_tree(A;T)  \msubseteq{}r  l\_tree(B;T)  supposing  A  \msubseteq{}r  B
Date html generated:
2018_05_22-PM-09_39_26
Last ObjectModification:
2017_03_04-PM-07_25_49
Theory : labeled!trees
Home
Index