Nuprl Lemma : rsum-of-nonneg-positive-iff

∀n,m:ℤ. ∀x:{n..m + 1-} ⟶ ℝ.  ((∀i:{n..m + 1-}. (r0 ≤ x[i])) ⇒ (r0 < Σ{x[i] | n≤i≤m} ⇐⇒ ∃i:{n..m + 1-}. (r0 < x[i])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rsum: Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m},  rleq: x ≤ y,  rless: x < y,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  guard: {T},  uimplies: b supposing a,  int_seg: {i..j-},  rless: x < y,  sq_exists: ∃x:{A| B[x]},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  real: ℝ,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  pointwise-rleq: x[k] ≤ y[k] for k ∈ [n,m],  rge: x ≥ y,  uiff: uiff(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  rless_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rsum_wf,  int_seg_wf,  exists_wf,  all_wf,  rleq_wf,  real_wf,  rsum-positive-implies,  rabs_wf,  rless_functionality,  req_weakening,  rabs-of-nonneg,  sq_stable__less_than,  nat_plus_properties,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  radd_wf,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  rsum-split,  rsum_nonneg,  le_wf,  rless_functionality_wrt_implies,  rleq_weakening_equal,  radd_functionality_wrt_rleq,  subtract_wf,  subtract-add-cancel,  radd_functionality,  rsum-split-last,  trivial-rless-radd,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  addEquality,  functionEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  unionElimination,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry

Latex:
\mforall{}n,m:\mBbbZ{}.  \mforall{}x:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}.
    ((\mforall{}i:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}.  (r0  \mleq{}  x[i]))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (r0  <  \mSigma{}\{x[i]  |  n\mleq{}i\mleq{}m\}  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mexists{}i:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}.  (r0  <  x[i])))



Date html generated: 2016_10_26-AM-09_17_28
Last ObjectModification: 2016_09_28-PM-06_09_00

Theory : reals


Home Index