Nuprl Lemma : list-set-type3

∀[T:Type]. ∀[L:T List]. ∀[P:T ⟶ ℙ].  L ∈ {x:T| P[x]}  List supposing ∃L':{x:T| P[x]}  List. (L = L' ∈ (T List))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  list: T List,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  cons: [a / b],  colength: colength(L),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  uiff: uiff(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  exists_wf,  list_wf,  equal_wf,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  equal-wf-T-base,  nat_wf,  colength_wf_list,  list-cases,  nil_wf,  equal-wf-base-T,  subtype_rel_list,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  le_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  set_wf,  cons_wf,  null_nil_lemma,  btrue_wf,  and_wf,  null_wf,  null_cons_lemma,  bfalse_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  cons_one_one,  reduce_hd_cons_lemma,  hd_wf,  squash_wf,  length_wf,  length_cons_ge_one,  top_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  thin,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  setEquality,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  because_Cache,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  unionElimination,  baseClosed,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  instantiate,  imageElimination,  hyp_replacement,  imageMemberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[L:T  List].  \mforall{}[P:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].    L  \mmember{}  \{x:T|  P[x]\}    List  supposing  \mexists{}L':\{x:T|  P[x]\}    List.  (L  =  L'\000C)



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-07_25_12
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_03_52

Theory : list_1


Home Index