Nuprl Lemma : sorted-by-exists
∀[T:Type]
  ∀eq,r:T ⟶ T ⟶ 𝔹.
    Linorder(T;a,b.↑(r a b))
    
⇒ (∀L:T List. ∃L':T List. (sorted-by(λx,y. (↑(r x y));L') ∧ no_repeats(T;L') ∧ L ⊆ L' ∧ L' ⊆ L)) 
    supposing ∀a,b:T.  (↑(eq a b) 
⇐⇒ a = b ∈ T)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
sorted-by: sorted-by(R;L)
, 
l_contains: A ⊆ B
, 
no_repeats: no_repeats(T;l)
, 
list: T List
, 
linorder: Linorder(T;x,y.R[x; y])
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
apply: f a
, 
lambda: λx.A[x]
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
, 
universe: Type
, 
equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y]
, 
so_apply: x[s1;s2]
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
cand: A c∧ B
, 
top: Top
, 
sorted-by: sorted-by(R;L)
, 
select: L[n]
, 
nil: []
, 
it: ⋅
, 
guard: {T}
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
l_contains: A ⊆ B
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x])
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
less_than: a < b
, 
squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced : 
assert_wf, 
assert_witness, 
equal_wf, 
list_induction, 
exists_wf, 
list_wf, 
sorted-by_wf, 
l_member_wf, 
no_repeats_wf, 
l_contains_wf, 
linorder_wf, 
all_wf, 
iff_wf, 
bool_wf, 
nil_wf, 
no_repeats_nil, 
l_contains_nil, 
length_of_nil_lemma, 
stuck-spread, 
base_wf, 
int_seg_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
insert-by_wf, 
cons_wf, 
insert-by-sorted-by, 
insert-by-no-repeats, 
l_all_cons, 
member-insert-by, 
select_wf, 
length_wf, 
decidable__le, 
intformnot_wf, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
decidable__lt, 
l_all_iff, 
cons_member
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
lambdaFormation, 
cut, 
introduction, 
sqequalRule, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
lambdaEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
productElimination, 
independent_pairEquality, 
axiomEquality, 
hypothesis, 
extract_by_obid, 
isectElimination, 
applyEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
cumulativity, 
independent_functionElimination, 
rename, 
productEquality, 
because_Cache, 
setElimination, 
setEquality, 
functionEquality, 
universeEquality, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
independent_pairFormation, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
baseClosed, 
independent_isectElimination, 
natural_numberEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
computeAll, 
inlFormation, 
unionElimination, 
imageElimination, 
inrFormation
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}eq,r:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.
        Linorder(T;a,b.\muparrow{}(r  a  b))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}L:T  List.  \mexists{}L':T  List.  (sorted-by(\mlambda{}x,y.  (\muparrow{}(r  x  y));L')  \mwedge{}  no\_repeats(T;L')  \mwedge{}  L  \msubseteq{}  L'  \mwedge{}  L'  \msubseteq{}  L)\000C) 
        supposing  \mforall{}a,b:T.    (\muparrow{}(eq  a  b)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  a  =  b)
Date html generated:
2017_04_17-AM-08_32_54
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-04_53_51
Theory : list_1
Home
Index