Nuprl Lemma : final-iterate-property

∀[A:Type]
  ∀f:A ⟶ (A + Top)
    (SWellFounded(p-graph(A;f) y x)
    ⇒ (∀x:A
          ∃n:ℕ
           ((↑can-apply(f^n;x)) c∧ ((final-iterate(f;x) = do-apply(f^n;x) ∈ A) ∧ (¬↑can-apply(f;final-iterate(f;x)))))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  final-iterate: final-iterate(f;x),  p-graph: p-graph(A;f),  p-fun-exp: f^n,  do-apply: do-apply(f;x),  can-apply: can-apply(f;x),  strongwellfounded: SWellFounded(R[x; y]),  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  cand: A c∧ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  union: left + right,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  p-graph: p-graph(A;f),  strongwellfounded: SWellFounded(R[x; y]),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  final-iterate: final-iterate(f;x),  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  nat: ℕ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  guard: {T},  ge: i ≥ j ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  can-apply: can-apply(f;x),  isl: isl(x),  p-fun-exp: f^n,  primrec: primrec(n;b;c),  p-id: p-id(),  btrue: tt,  true: True,  do-apply: do-apply(f;x),  outl: outl(x),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff
Lemmas referenced :  le_wf,  all_wf,  subtract_wf,  exists_wf,  nat_wf,  assert_wf,  can-apply_wf,  p-fun-exp_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  top_wf,  subtype_rel_union,  equal_wf,  final-iterate_wf,  do-apply_wf,  not_wf,  set_wf,  less_than_wf,  primrec-wf2,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  strongwellfounded_wf,  p-graph_wf2,  bool_wf,  nat_properties,  intformand_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  equal-wf-T-base,  bnot_wf,  false_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  p-fun-exp-add1-sq,  eqtt_to_assert,  uiff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  hypothesis,  addLevel,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  thin,  productElimination,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  hypothesisEquality,  cumulativity,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  unionEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  levelHypothesis,  universeEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  applyLambdaEquality,  baseClosed,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageElimination,  addEquality,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]
    \mforall{}f:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  (A  +  Top)
        (SWellFounded(p-graph(A;f)  y  x)
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:A
                    \mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}
                      ((\muparrow{}can-apply(f\^{}n;x))
                      c\mwedge{}  ((final-iterate(f;x)  =  do-apply(f\^{}n;x))  \mwedge{}  (\mneg{}\muparrow{}can-apply(f;final-iterate(f;x)))))))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-07_36_50
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-05_10_49

Theory : general


Home Index