Nuprl Lemma : sparse-signed-rep_wf

∀[m:ℤ]
  (sparse-signed-rep(m) ∈ {L:{-1..2-} List| 
                           (m = Σi<||L||.L[i]*2^i ∈ ℤ)
                           ∧ (0 < ||L|| ⇒ (¬(last(L) = 0 ∈ ℤ)))
                           ∧ (∀i:ℕ||L|| - 1. ((L[i] = 0 ∈ ℤ) ∨ (L[i + 1] = 0 ∈ ℤ)))} )


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  sparse-signed-rep: sparse-signed-rep(m),  power-sum: Σi<n.a[i]*x^i,  last: last(L),  select: L[n],  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  int_seg: {i..j-},  less_than: a < b,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  minus: -n,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  sparse-signed-rep: sparse-signed-rep(m),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  so_apply: x[s],  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  select: L[n],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  cons: [a / b],  bfalse: ff,  uiff: uiff(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  sparse-signed-rep-exists-ext,  subtype_rel_self,  sq_exists_wf,  list_wf,  int_seg_wf,  equal-wf-base-T,  int_subtype_base,  power-sum_wf,  length_wf_nat,  select_wf,  int_seg_properties,  length_wf,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  less_than_wf,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  last_wf,  subtype_rel_list,  list-cases,  null_nil_lemma,  length_of_nil_lemma,  stuck-spread,  base_wf,  product_subtype_list,  null_cons_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  false_wf,  all_wf,  subtract_wf,  or_wf,  subtract-is-int-iff,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  equal_wf,  evalall-reduce,  list-valueall-type,  set-valueall-type,  lelt_wf,  int-valueall-type
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  applyEquality,  thin,  instantiate,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  functionEquality,  intEquality,  minusEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  productEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  lambdaFormation,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  pointwiseFunctionality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  addEquality,  axiomEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[m:\mBbbZ{}]
    (sparse-signed-rep(m)  \mmember{}  \{L:\{-1..2\msupminus{}\}  List| 
                                                      (m  =  \mSigma{}i<||L||.L[i]*2\^{}i)
                                                      \mwedge{}  (0  <  ||L||  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}(last(L)  =  0)))
                                                      \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}||L||  -  1.  ((L[i]  =  0)  \mvee{}  (L[i  +  1]  =  0)))\}  )



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-08_36_01
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-PM-05_05_53

Theory : general


Home Index