Nuprl Lemma : very-dep-fun-subtype

∀[A,B:Type]. ∀[C:A ⟶ B ⟶ Type]. ∀[f:very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a;b])].
  (f ∈ {L:(a:A × b:B × C[a;b]) List| vdf-eq(A;f;L)}  ⟶ B ⟶ A)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  very-dep-fun: very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a; b]),  vdf-eq: vdf-eq(A;f;L),  list: T List,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  product: x:A × B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  very-dep-fun: very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a; b]),  vdf: vdf(A;B;a,b.C[a; b];n),  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  cons: [a / b],  ge: i ≥ j ,  le: A ≤ B,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  list_wf,  vdf-eq_wf,  very-dep-fun_wf,  istype-universe,  length_wf,  istype-int,  vdf_wf,  lt_int_wf,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  less_than_wf,  istype-less_than,  istype-assert,  istype-void,  bool_cases,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  list-cases,  length_of_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  length_of_cons_lemma,  le_weakening2,  non_neg_length,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  length_wf_nat,  set_subtype_base,  le_wf,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-le
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  functionExtensionality,  rename,  setElimination,  thin,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  setEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  productEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality_alt,  universeIsType,  dependent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  isectIsTypeImplies,  inhabitedIsType,  functionIsType,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  isectIsType,  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  cumulativity,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation_alt,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  Error :memTop,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  voidElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  equalityIstype,  intEquality,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  dependentIntersectionEqElimination,  productIsType

Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B:Type].  \mforall{}[C:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  B  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f:very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a;b])].
    (f  \mmember{}  \{L:(a:A  \mtimes{}  b:B  \mtimes{}  C[a;b])  List|  vdf-eq(A;f;L)\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  B  {}\mrightarrow{}  A)



Date html generated: 2020_05_19-PM-09_41_01
Last ObjectModification: 2020_03_05-AM-11_40_26

Theory : co-recursion-2


Home Index