Nuprl Lemma : last_induction

∀[T:Type]. ∀[Q:(T List) ⟶ ℙ].  (Q[[]] ⇒ (∀ys:T List. ∀y:T.  (Q[ys] ⇒ Q[ys @ [y]])) ⇒ {∀zs:T List. Q[zs]})


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  append: as @ bs,  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  list: T List,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  guard: {T},  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  cons: [a / b],  bfalse: ff,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_seg_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_subtype,  false_wf,  set_wf,  lelt_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  le_wf,  length_wf,  non_neg_length,  nat_properties,  decidable__lt,  less_than_wf,  decidable__assert,  null_wf,  all_wf,  list_wf,  primrec-wf2,  nat_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  length_wf_nat,  append_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  list-cases,  null_nil_lemma,  length_of_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  null_cons_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  last_lemma,  last_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  length_append,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  length-singleton
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  unionElimination,  addLevel,  applyEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  levelHypothesis,  hypothesis_subsumption,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  cumulativity,  imageElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  functionExtensionality,  addEquality,  universeEquality,  promote_hyp,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  hyp_replacement,  Error :applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[Q:(T  List)  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    (Q[[]]  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}ys:T  List.  \mforall{}y:T.    (Q[ys]  {}\mRightarrow{}  Q[ys  @  [y]]))  {}\mRightarrow{}  \{\mforall{}zs:T  List.  Q[zs]\})



Date html generated: 2016_10_21-AM-10_08_40
Last ObjectModification: 2016_07_12-AM-05_28_17

Theory : list_1


Home Index