Nuprl Lemma : permutation-generators4

∀n:ℕ
  ∀[P:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)}  ⟶ ℙ]
    (P[λx.x]
    ⇒ (∀f:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)} . ∀j:ℕ+n.  (P[f] ⇒ P[f o (0, j)]))
    ⇒ (∀f:{f:ℕn ⟶ ℕn| Inj(ℕn;ℕn;f)} . P[f]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  flip: (i, j),  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  compose: f o g,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  top: Top,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  guard: {T},  not: ¬A,  false: False,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  squash: ↓T,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  compose: f o g,  eq_int: (i =z j),  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  bfalse: ff,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  flip: (i, j)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  identity-injection,  flip_wf,  decidable__le,  lelt_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__lt,  nat_properties,  int_seg_properties,  false_wf,  flip-injection,  compose-injections,  all_wf,  set_wf,  less_than_wf,  inject_wf,  int_seg_wf,  member-less_than,  permutation-generators3,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  decidable__equal_int,  sq_stable__inject,  inject-compose,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  eq_int_wf
Rules used in proof :  cumulativity,  instantiate,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  approximateComputation,  unionElimination,  productElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  universeEquality,  lambdaEquality,  sqequalRule,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  functionEquality,  setEquality,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  isectElimination,  isect_memberFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  cut,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  applyLambdaEquality,  hyp_replacement,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}
    \mforall{}[P:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}]
        (P[\mlambda{}x.x]
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}  .  \mforall{}j:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}n.    (P[f]  {}\mRightarrow{}  P[f  o  (0,  j)]))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:\{f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}n|  Inj(\mBbbN{}n;\mBbbN{}n;f)\}  .  P[f]))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-00_42_59
Last ObjectModification: 2017_12_11-PM-02_20_47

Theory : list_1


Home Index