Nuprl Lemma : bag-union-bagp

∀[T:Type]. ∀[bbs:bag(bag(T))].  (0 < #([b∈bbs|0 <z #(b)]) ⇒ (bag-union(bbs) ∈ T Bag+))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-union: bag-union(bbs),  bagp: T Bag+,  bag-size: #(bs),  bag-filter: [x∈b|p[x]],  bag: bag(T),  lt_int: i <z j,  less_than: a < b,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bagp: T Bag+,  squash: ↓T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  empty-bag: {},  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  cons-bag: x.b,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  nat: ℕ,  guard: {T},  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b
Lemmas referenced :  bag-union_wf,  bag_to_squash_list,  less_than_wf,  bag-size_wf,  bag_wf,  assert_wf,  lt_int_wf,  bag-filter_wf,  list_induction,  list-subtype-bag,  list_wf,  bag_filter_empty_lemma,  bag_union_empty_lemma,  bag_size_empty_lemma,  bag_filter_cons_lemma,  bag_union_cons_lemma,  bag-size-append,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  bag_size_cons_lemma,  decidable__lt,  subtype_rel_self,  nat_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  add_nat_plus,  nat_plus_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  add-is-int-iff,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  false_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  promote_hyp,  equalitySymmetry,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setEquality,  applyEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  rename,  functionEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  addEquality,  setElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  instantiate,  pointwiseFunctionality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  axiomEquality,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[bbs:bag(bag(T))].    (0  <  \#([b\mmember{}bbs|0  <z  \#(b)])  {}\mRightarrow{}  (bag-union(bbs)  \mmember{}  T  Bag\msupplus{}))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_46_29
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_31_18

Theory : bags


Home Index