Nuprl Lemma : bag_remove1_aux_wf
∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x:T]. ∀[bs,checked:T List]. (bag_remove1_aux(eq;checked;x;bs) ∈ T List?)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
bag_remove1_aux: bag_remove1_aux(eq;checked;a;as),
list: T List,
deq: EqDecider(T),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
unit: Unit,
member: t ∈ T,
union: left + right,
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
nat: ℕ,
implies: P ⇒ Q,
false: False,
ge: i ≥ j ,
uimplies: b supposing a,
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),
exists: ∃x:A. B[x],
not: ¬A,
top: Top,
and: P ∧ Q,
prop: ℙ,
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
guard: {T},
or: P ∨ Q,
bag_remove1_aux: bag_remove1_aux(eq;checked;a;as),
so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],
unit: Unit,
cons: [a / b],
colength: colength(L),
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
decidable: Dec(P),
nil: [],
it: ⋅,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
sq_type: SQType(T),
less_than: a < b,
squash: ↓T,
less_than': less_than'(a;b),
deq: EqDecider(T),
bool: 𝔹,
btrue: tt,
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,
uiff: uiff(P;Q),
eqof: eqof(d),
bfalse: ff,
bnot: ¬bb,
assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :
nat_properties,
satisfiable-full-omega-tt,
intformand_wf,
intformle_wf,
itermConstant_wf,
itermVar_wf,
intformless_wf,
int_formula_prop_and_lemma,
int_formula_prop_le_lemma,
int_term_value_constant_lemma,
int_term_value_var_lemma,
int_formula_prop_less_lemma,
int_formula_prop_wf,
ge_wf,
less_than_wf,
equal-wf-T-base,
nat_wf,
colength_wf_list,
less_than_transitivity1,
less_than_irreflexivity,
list-cases,
list_ind_nil_lemma,
list_wf,
product_subtype_list,
spread_cons_lemma,
intformeq_wf,
itermAdd_wf,
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,
int_term_value_add_lemma,
decidable__le,
intformnot_wf,
int_formula_prop_not_lemma,
le_wf,
equal_wf,
subtract_wf,
itermSubtract_wf,
int_term_value_subtract_lemma,
subtype_base_sq,
set_subtype_base,
int_subtype_base,
decidable__equal_int,
list_ind_cons_lemma,
bool_wf,
eqtt_to_assert,
safe-assert-deq,
append_wf,
unit_wf2,
eqff_to_assert,
bool_cases_sqequal,
bool_subtype_base,
assert-bnot,
cons_wf,
deq_wf
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
introduction,
cut,
thin,
lambdaFormation,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
hypothesisEquality,
hypothesis,
setElimination,
rename,
sqequalRule,
intWeakElimination,
natural_numberEquality,
independent_isectElimination,
dependent_pairFormation,
lambdaEquality,
int_eqEquality,
intEquality,
dependent_functionElimination,
isect_memberEquality,
voidElimination,
voidEquality,
independent_pairFormation,
computeAll,
independent_functionElimination,
axiomEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
because_Cache,
cumulativity,
applyEquality,
unionElimination,
inrEquality,
promote_hyp,
hypothesis_subsumption,
productElimination,
applyLambdaEquality,
dependent_set_memberEquality,
addEquality,
baseClosed,
instantiate,
imageElimination,
equalityElimination,
inlEquality,
universeEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]. \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)]. \mforall{}[x:T]. \mforall{}[bs,checked:T List].
(bag\_remove1\_aux(eq;checked;x;bs) \mmember{} T List?)
Date html generated:
2018_05_21-PM-09_47_57
Last ObjectModification:
2017_07_26-PM-06_30_30
Theory : bags_2
Home
Index