Nuprl Lemma : power-sum_functionality_wrt_eqmod

∀m:ℤ. ∀n:ℕ. ∀x,y:ℤ. ∀a,b:ℕn ⟶ ℤ.
  ((x ≡ y mod m) ⇒ (∀i:ℕn. (a[i] ≡ b[i] mod m)) ⇒ (Σi<n.a[i]*x^i ≡ Σi<n.b[i]*y^i mod m))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  power-sum: Σi<n.a[i]*x^i,  eqmod: a ≡ b mod m,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  power-sum: Σi<n.a[i]*x^i,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  lt_int: i <z j,  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_wf,  eqmod_wf,  istype-nat,  istype-int,  exp_wf2,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  istype-void,  int_seg_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  add_functionality_wrt_eqmod,  primrec_wf,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  istype-le,  decidable__lt,  istype-less_than,  sum-as-primrec,  primrec-unroll,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  int_subtype_base,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  less_than_wf,  primrec-wf2,  all_wf,  eqmod_weakening,  eqmod_functionality_wrt_eqmod,  multiply_functionality_wrt_eqmod,  exp_functionality_wrt_eqmod
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalRule,  functionIsType,  universeIsType,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  inhabitedIsType,  lambdaEquality_alt,  multiplyEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  productElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  closedConclusion,  intEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  unionElimination,  addEquality,  productIsType,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityIsType4,  baseApply,  baseClosed,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityIsType1,  setIsType,  functionEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}m:\mBbbZ{}.  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}x,y:\mBbbZ{}.  \mforall{}a,b:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}.
    ((x  \mequiv{}  y  mod  m)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}n.  (a[i]  \mequiv{}  b[i]  mod  m))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mSigma{}i<n.a[i]*x\^{}i  \mequiv{}  \mSigma{}i<n.b[i]*y\^{}i  mod  m))



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_25_40
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_19-AM-11_45_28

Theory : general


Home Index