Nuprl Lemma : FOL-abstract_wf

[fmla:mFOL()]. (FOL-abstract(fmla) ∈ AbstractFOFormula+(mFOL-freevars(fmla)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  FOL-abstract: FOL-abstract(fmla) mFOL-freevars: mFOL-freevars(fmla) mFOL: mFOL() AbstractFOFormula+: AbstractFOFormula+(vs) uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T all: x:A. B[x] nat: implies:  Q false: False ge: i ≥  uimplies: supposing a satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] not: ¬A top: Top and: P ∧ Q prop: guard: {T} subtype_rel: A ⊆B int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q le: A ≤ B less_than': less_than'(a;b) ext-eq: A ≡ B bool: 𝔹 unit: Unit it: btrue: tt uiff: uiff(P;Q) sq_type: SQType(T) eq_atom: =a y ifthenelse: if then else fi  mFOatomic: name(vars) mFOL_size: mFOL_size(p) spreadn: spread3 bfalse: ff bnot: ¬bb assert: b mFOconnect: mFOconnect(knd;left;right) cand: c∧ B less_than: a < b squash: T mFOquant: mFOquant(isall;var;body) FOL-abstract: FOL-abstract(fmla) mFOL-freevars: mFOL-freevars(fmla) mFOL_ind: mFOL_ind AbstractFOFormula+: AbstractFOFormula+(vs) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] l_contains: A ⊆ B l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]) iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermVar_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_formula_prop_wf ge_wf less_than_wf le_wf mFOL_size_wf mFOL_wf int_seg_wf int_seg_properties decidable__le subtract_wf intformnot_wf itermSubtract_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_term_value_subtract_lemma decidable__equal_int int_seg_subtype false_wf intformeq_wf int_formula_prop_eq_lemma mFOL-ext eq_atom_wf bool_wf eqtt_to_assert assert_of_eq_atom subtype_base_sq atom_subtype_base eqff_to_assert equal_wf bool_cases_sqequal bool_subtype_base assert-bnot neg_assert_of_eq_atom decidable__lt itermAdd_wf int_term_value_add_lemma lelt_wf nat_wf AbstractFOAtomic+_wf FOStruct+_wf FOAssignment_wf remove-repeats_wf int-deq_wf subtype_rel_self subtype_rel_dep_function subtype_rel_FOAssignment remove-repeats_property select_wf length_wf select_member FOConnective+_wf mFOL-freevars_wf FOQuantifier+_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut thin lambdaFormation extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination hypothesisEquality hypothesis setElimination rename sqequalRule intWeakElimination natural_numberEquality independent_isectElimination dependent_pairFormation lambdaEquality int_eqEquality intEquality dependent_functionElimination isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll independent_functionElimination axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry applyEquality because_Cache productElimination unionElimination applyLambdaEquality hypothesis_subsumption dependent_set_memberEquality promote_hyp tokenEquality equalityElimination instantiate cumulativity atomEquality imageElimination addEquality universeEquality functionEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[fmla:mFOL()].  (FOL-abstract(fmla)  \mmember{}  AbstractFOFormula+(mFOL-freevars(fmla)))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-10_23_04
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_38_17

Theory : minimal-first-order-logic


Home Index