Nuprl Lemma : A-loop_wf

∀[Val:Type]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[AType:array{i:l}(Val;n)].
  ∀lo:ℕn. ∀k:ℕ.  (k < n - lo ⇒ (∀[body:{lo..lo + k-} ⟶ (A-map Unit)]. (A-loop(AType;lo;lo + k;body) ∈ A-map Unit)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  A-loop: A-loop(AType;lo;hi;body),  A-map: A-map,  array-model: array-model(AType),  array: array{i:l}(Val;n),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  unit: Unit,  member: t ∈ T,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  A-loop: A-loop(AType;lo;hi;body),  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  squash: ↓T,  label: ...$L... t,  subtract: n - m,  sq_type: SQType(T),  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_wf,  A-map_wf,  unit_wf2,  less_than_wf,  subtract_wf,  nat_wf,  array_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  le_int_wf,  bool_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  assert_wf,  le_wf,  A-null_wf,  lt_int_wf,  bnot_wf,  int_seg_properties,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  uiff_transitivity,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_functionality_wrt_uiff,  bnot_of_le_int,  assert_of_lt_int,  equal_wf,  decidable__lt,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype,  subtype_rel_self,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  member_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  and_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  iff_weakening_equal,  lelt_wf,  A-bind_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  addEquality,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  cumulativity,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  universeEquality,  intWeakElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  equalityElimination,  imageElimination,  minusEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  instantiate,  imageMemberEquality,  functionExtensionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[Val:Type].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[AType:array\{i:l\}(Val;n)].
    \mforall{}lo:\mBbbN{}n.  \mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}.
        (k  <  n  -  lo
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}[body:\{lo..lo  +  k\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (A-map  Unit)].  (A-loop(AType;lo;lo  +  k;body)  \mmember{}  A-map  Unit)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_44_13
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_30_10

Theory : monads


Home Index