Nuprl Lemma : funtype-split

∀[T:Type]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[m:ℕn + 1]. ∀[A:ℕn ⟶ Type].  (funtype(n;A;T) = funtype(m;A;funtype(n - m;λk.(A (k + m));T)) ∈ Type)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  funtype: funtype(n;A;T),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  guard: {T},  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  funtype: funtype(n;A;T),  squash: ↓T,  le: A ≤ B,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  less_than: a < b,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
Lemmas referenced :  subtract_wf,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  equal_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_wf,  add-zero,  primrec0_lemma,  funtype_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  funtype-unroll-last-eq,  add-member-int_seg2,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  add-commutes
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  lambdaFormation,  intWeakElimination,  axiomEquality,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  functionExtensionality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[m:\mBbbN{}n  +  1].  \mforall{}[A:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].
    (funtype(n;A;T)  =  funtype(m;A;funtype(n  -  m;\mlambda{}k.(A  (k  +  m));T)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_39_46
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_27_42

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index