Nuprl Lemma : p2J_functionality
∀[a1,b1,a2,b2:ℙ^2].  (p2J(a1;b1) = p2J(a2;b2)) supposing (b1 = b2 and a1 = a2 and a1 ≠ b1)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
p2J: p2J(a;b)
, 
proj-eq: a = b
, 
proj-sep: a ≠ b
, 
real-proj: ℙ^n
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
guard: {T}
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
sq_stable: SqStable(P)
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
real-proj: ℙ^n
, 
real-vec-mul: a*X
, 
req-vec: req-vec(n;x;y)
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
p2J: p2J(a;b)
, 
eq_int: (i =z j)
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
btrue: tt
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
top: Top
, 
real-vec: ℝ^n
, 
less_than: a < b
, 
true: True
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
, 
req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2
Lemmas referenced : 
sq_stable__proj-eq, 
false_wf, 
le_wf, 
p2J_wf, 
proj-sep_functionality, 
proj-eq-iff, 
proj-eq_wf, 
proj-sep_wf, 
real-proj_wf, 
rmul-neq-zero, 
rmul_wf, 
rneq_wf, 
int-to-real_wf, 
req-vec_wf, 
real-vec-mul_wf, 
decidable__equal_int, 
subtype_base_sq, 
int_subtype_base, 
int_seg_properties, 
int_seg_subtype, 
int_seg_cases, 
full-omega-unsat, 
intformand_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
rsub_wf, 
lelt_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
itermMultiply_wf, 
req-iff-rsub-is-0, 
req_functionality, 
rsub_functionality, 
rmul_functionality, 
req_weakening, 
real_polynomial_null, 
real_term_value_sub_lemma, 
real_term_value_mul_lemma, 
real_term_value_var_lemma, 
real_term_value_const_lemma
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
thin, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
natural_numberEquality, 
sqequalRule, 
independent_pairFormation, 
lambdaFormation, 
hypothesis, 
hypothesisEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
because_Cache, 
independent_functionElimination, 
productElimination, 
imageElimination, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
addEquality, 
applyEquality, 
lambdaEquality, 
unionElimination, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
intEquality, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
hypothesis_subsumption, 
approximateComputation, 
int_eqEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[a1,b1,a2,b2:\mBbbP{}\^{}2].    (p2J(a1;b1)  =  p2J(a2;b2))  supposing  (b1  =  b2  and  a1  =  a2  and  a1  \mneq{}  b1)
Date html generated:
2017_10_05-AM-00_20_24
Last ObjectModification:
2017_06_17-AM-10_09_43
Theory : inner!product!spaces
Home
Index