Nuprl Lemma : real-cont-iff-continuous

∀a,b:ℝ.  ((a ≤ b) ⇒ (∀f:[a, b] ⟶ℝ. (real-cont(f;a;b) ⇐⇒ f[x] continuous for x ∈ [a, b])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  real-cont: real-cont(f;a;b),  continuous: f[x] continuous for x ∈ I,  rfun: I ⟶ℝ,  rccint: [l, u],  rleq: x ≤ y,  real: ℝ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  real-cont: real-cont(f;a;b),  continuous: f[x] continuous for x ∈ I,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  label: ...$L... t,  rfun: I ⟶ℝ,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  i-approx: i-approx(I;n),  rccint: [l, u],  top: Top,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  cand: A c∧ B,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uimplies: b supposing a,  rneq: x ≠ y,  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  rless: x < y,  decidable: Dec(P),  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  rge: x ≥ y,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  rleq: x ≤ y,  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  le: A ≤ B
Lemmas referenced :  nat_plus_wf,  icompact_wf,  i-approx_wf,  rccint_wf,  real-cont_wf,  continuous_wf,  i-member_wf,  rfun_wf,  rleq_wf,  real_wf,  member_rccint_lemma,  istype-void,  sq_stable__rless,  int-to-real_wf,  rleq_functionality_wrt_implies,  rabs_wf,  rsub_wf,  rdiv_wf,  rless-int,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  rless_wf,  rleq_weakening_equal,  rleq_weakening,  itermSubtract_wf,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  real_polynomial_null,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  istype-less_than,  rccint-icompact,  sq_stable__rleq,  le_witness_for_triv
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  universeIsType,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  setIsType,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality_alt,  applyEquality,  inhabitedIsType,  dependent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  dependent_set_memberFormation_alt,  setElimination,  rename,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  because_Cache,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  productIsType,  closedConclusion,  independent_isectElimination,  inrFormation_alt,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionIsType,  functionIsTypeImplies

Latex:
\mforall{}a,b:\mBbbR{}.    ((a  \mleq{}  b)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}f:[a,  b]  {}\mrightarrow{}\mBbbR{}.  (real-cont(f;a;b)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  f[x]  continuous  for  x  \mmember{}  [a,  b])))



Date html generated: 2019_10_30-AM-07_15_43
Last ObjectModification: 2019_10_09-PM-06_37_59

Theory : reals


Home Index